Difference between revisions of "Talk:A greater pit fiend"
(→Actual XP values: new section) |
m (Patojonas moved page Talk:Greater pit fiend to Talk:A greater pit fiend: name change ingame) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
280 283 286 289 292 294 297 300 303 306 308 311 314 317 320 322 325 328 331 334 336 339 342 345 348 350 | 280 283 286 289 292 294 297 300 303 306 308 311 314 317 320 322 325 328 331 334 336 339 342 345 348 350 | ||
--[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] 09:40, 4 January 2010 (UTC) | --[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] 09:40, 4 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Drop Rates== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Out of 700 greater pit fiends, I got: | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Claws (stolen from [[Talk:Surly_gambler|here]]): | ||
| + | {| cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" border="1" align="left" style="text-align:center" | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! !! No drops !! One drop !! Two drops !! Three drops | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Observed || {{statrate|700|320|+}}% || {{statrate|700|287|+}}% || {{statrate|700|87|+}}% || {{statrate|700|6|+}}% | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Predicted (23%) | ||
| + | | {{#expr: (1-0.23)*(1-0.23)*(1-0.23)*100 round 1}}% | ||
| + | | {{#expr: 3*0.23*(1-0.23)*(1-0.23)*100 round 1}}% | ||
| + | | {{#expr: 3*0.23*0.23*(1-0.23)*100 round 1}}% | ||
| + | | {{#expr:0.23*0.23*0.23*100 round 1}}% | ||
| + | |}<br clear="all"> | ||
| + | *176 skulls {{statrate|700|176|+}}% | ||
| + | *31 ashes {{statrate|700|31|+}}% | ||
| + | |||
| + | Values are similar to those on the lesser pit fiend. Merging data from both foes we get the following: | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Claws (stolen from [[Talk:Surly_gambler|here]]): | ||
| + | {| cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" border="1" align="left" style="text-align:center" | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! !! No drops !! One drop !! Two drops !! Three drops | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Observed || {{statrate|1440|667|+}}% || {{statrate|1440|569|+}}% || {{statrate|1440|189|+}}% || {{statrate|1440|15|+}}% | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Predicted (23%) | ||
| + | | {{#expr: (1-0.23)*(1-0.23)*(1-0.23)*100 round 1}}% | ||
| + | | {{#expr: 3*0.23*(1-0.23)*(1-0.23)*100 round 1}}% | ||
| + | | {{#expr: 3*0.23*0.23*(1-0.23)*100 round 1}}% | ||
| + | | {{#expr:0.23*0.23*0.23*100 round 1}}% | ||
| + | |}<br clear="all"> | ||
| + | *355 skulls {{statrate|1440|355|+}}% | ||
| + | *60 ashes {{statrate|1440|60|+}}% | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'll use this to both foes instead, if anyone finds this a bad choice then replace the values by their individual results. [[User:Patojonas|Patojonas]] 12:25, 21 September 2012 (PDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 08:26, 30 November 2013
See old discussion here.--Muhandes 07:21, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
What's this about "appears upon giving the mystic the materials"? I've been fighting them starting at level 11, before the mystic even appears! --Tarwix 00:48, 26 February 2008 (MST)
I've noticed ice and fire resistance, but never electricity resistance. Anyone else? - Darryl
Actual XP values
XP scales from scale from level*8 (inclusive) up to level*10 (inclusive), however, not all values of XP are possible. They seem to follow something like ceiling(level*(8+2*randint(0,25)/25)). For example, level 35 values are:
280 283 286 289 292 294 297 300 303 306 308 311 314 317 320 322 325 328 331 334 336 339 342 345 348 350 --Muhandes 09:40, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Drop Rates
Out of 700 greater pit fiends, I got:
- Claws (stolen from here):
| No drops | One drop | Two drops | Three drops | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observed | 45.7 ± 3.8% | 41 ± 3.7% | 12.4 ± 2.5% | 0.9 ± 0.7% |
| Predicted (23%) | 45.7% | 40.9% | 12.2% | 1.2% |
- 176 skulls 25.1 ± 3.3%
- 31 ashes 4.4 ± 1.6%
Values are similar to those on the lesser pit fiend. Merging data from both foes we get the following:
- Claws (stolen from here):
| No drops | One drop | Two drops | Three drops | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observed | 46.3 ± 2.6% | 39.5 ± 2.6% | 13.1 ± 1.8% | 1 ± 0.5% |
| Predicted (23%) | 45.7% | 40.9% | 12.2% | 1.2% |
- 355 skulls 24.7 ± 2.3%
- 60 ashes 4.2 ± 1.1%
I'll use this to both foes instead, if anyone finds this a bad choice then replace the values by their individual results. Patojonas 12:25, 21 September 2012 (PDT)
