Difference between revisions of "Talk:Yule blocks"
From Twilight Heroes Wiki
(more data, cleanup) |
(cap formula spaded) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Here's the numbers I have so far on this: | Here's the numbers I have so far on this: | ||
− | : 75834 XP | | 525 Chips | + | :115015 XP | | 589 Chips |
+ | : 75834 XP | | 525 Chips | ||
: 46599 XP | | 466 Chips | : 46599 XP | | 466 Chips | ||
: 22022 XP | | 408 Chips | : 22022 XP | | 408 Chips | ||
+ | : 4735 XP | | 317 Chips | ||
: 3414 XP | | 317 Chips | : 3414 XP | | 317 Chips | ||
: 2559 XP | | 309 Chips | : 2559 XP | | 309 Chips | ||
: 2123 XP | | 304 Chips | : 2123 XP | | 304 Chips | ||
− | : | + | : 1179 XP | | 281 Chips |
− | : | + | : 1082 XP | | 279 Chips |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
---- | ---- | ||
− | : | + | Check [https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B8MEg0ItIkfMS0VNc3E1ckNVTmM/edit here] for data and analysis. |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
---- | ---- | ||
Threshold 250 XP | Threshold 250 XP | ||
Line 84: | Line 26: | ||
:Past 250, values seems to follow the formula <code>250 + A*{{radic|(XP-250)}}</code>.<br>Oddly enough, in the data set above, taken from various accounts, there seems to be 2 data sets with different values of A, one close to but a bit higher than 1 and the other close to but higher than 2. Data was acquired in different days so either there was some tweaking in the formula or some unknown factor is influencing the result. [[User:Patojonas|Patojonas]] 09:05, 4 December 2013 (PST) | :Past 250, values seems to follow the formula <code>250 + A*{{radic|(XP-250)}}</code>.<br>Oddly enough, in the data set above, taken from various accounts, there seems to be 2 data sets with different values of A, one close to but a bit higher than 1 and the other close to but higher than 2. Data was acquired in different days so either there was some tweaking in the formula or some unknown factor is influencing the result. [[User:Patojonas|Patojonas]] 09:05, 4 December 2013 (PST) | ||
::I've added some more data and removed unnecessary information, easier to move to a spreadsheet now. [[User:Patojonas|Patojonas]] 07:28, 5 December 2013 (PST) | ::I've added some more data and removed unnecessary information, easier to move to a spreadsheet now. [[User:Patojonas|Patojonas]] 07:28, 5 December 2013 (PST) | ||
+ | :::Apparently Winsdays were adding +10 chips and not +5. That is the cause for the 2 data sets and has been fixed. More data added. [[User:Patojonas|Patojonas]] 15:32, 9 December 2013 (PST) | ||
+ | :Damage cap formula is spaded. [[User:Patojonas|Patojonas]] 09:51, 13 December 2013 (PST) | ||
Thought: does "base XP" in this context follow foe toughness modifiers? --[[User:XKiv|XKiv]] ([[User talk:XKiv|talk]]) 08:58, 4 December 2013 (PST) | Thought: does "base XP" in this context follow foe toughness modifiers? --[[User:XKiv|XKiv]] ([[User talk:XKiv|talk]]) 08:58, 4 December 2013 (PST) | ||
:By base XP I mean the value that shows on the wiki, unaffected by anything. [[User:Patojonas|Patojonas]] 09:05, 4 December 2013 (PST) | :By base XP I mean the value that shows on the wiki, unaffected by anything. [[User:Patojonas|Patojonas]] 09:05, 4 December 2013 (PST) | ||
+ | ::Then that's wrong, because (I just checked and) casting sundowner's increased X from all s7g robots by a bunch (just a small one, I only have 2 points in the skill), and running out of it decreased X back to what it was before casting it. --[[User:XKiv|XKiv]] ([[User talk:XKiv|talk]]) 12:43, 10 December 2013 (PST) | ||
+ | :I never saw anything affect it but I never tried sundowner. [http://forums.twilightheroes.com/viewtopic.php?t=437&start=575#p33757 According to Kinak], it works with ''some'' bonuses guess we need to make a list of them all =S [[User:Patojonas|Patojonas]] 14:28, 10 December 2013 (PST) |
Latest revision as of 09:51, 13 December 2013
Here's the numbers I have so far on this:
- 115015 XP | | 589 Chips
- 75834 XP | | 525 Chips
- 46599 XP | | 466 Chips
- 22022 XP | | 408 Chips
- 4735 XP | | 317 Chips
- 3414 XP | | 317 Chips
- 2559 XP | | 309 Chips
- 2123 XP | | 304 Chips
- 1179 XP | | 281 Chips
- 1082 XP | | 279 Chips
Check here for data and analysis.
Threshold 250 XP
- 249 XP | | 249 Chips
- 245 XP | | 245 Chips
- 237 XP | | 237 Chips
- 218 XP | | 218 Chips
- 201 XP | | 201 Chips
Threshold seems to be at 250 chips. Just tested with clock zone foes, non scaling foes also have the chips limited. Patojonas 06:12, 4 December 2013 (PST)
- Past 250, values seems to follow the formula
250 + A*√(XP-250)
.
Oddly enough, in the data set above, taken from various accounts, there seems to be 2 data sets with different values of A, one close to but a bit higher than 1 and the other close to but higher than 2. Data was acquired in different days so either there was some tweaking in the formula or some unknown factor is influencing the result. Patojonas 09:05, 4 December 2013 (PST)- I've added some more data and removed unnecessary information, easier to move to a spreadsheet now. Patojonas 07:28, 5 December 2013 (PST)
- Apparently Winsdays were adding +10 chips and not +5. That is the cause for the 2 data sets and has been fixed. More data added. Patojonas 15:32, 9 December 2013 (PST)
- I've added some more data and removed unnecessary information, easier to move to a spreadsheet now. Patojonas 07:28, 5 December 2013 (PST)
- Damage cap formula is spaded. Patojonas 09:51, 13 December 2013 (PST)
Thought: does "base XP" in this context follow foe toughness modifiers? --XKiv (talk) 08:58, 4 December 2013 (PST)
- By base XP I mean the value that shows on the wiki, unaffected by anything. Patojonas 09:05, 4 December 2013 (PST)
- I never saw anything affect it but I never tried sundowner. According to Kinak, it works with some bonuses guess we need to make a list of them all =S Patojonas 14:28, 10 December 2013 (PST)