Difference between revisions of "Talk:Items by Name"
(just a thought.) |
(signed) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
cant we just have the template "auto add" newly added items to this page?--[[User:Reaper|Reaper]] 15:38, 12 June 2008 (MST) | cant we just have the template "auto add" newly added items to this page?--[[User:Reaper|Reaper]] 15:38, 12 June 2008 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Seconded... It would be nice if pages like this were set up to work automatically through transclusion. The "Melee Weapon Summary Table" and all the rest of the equipment summary tables are also becoming out of date. --[[User:Tycho Everett|Tycho Everett]] 17:18, 1 July 2008 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Verification == | ||
| + | |||
| + | While very bored (seminars do that) I went over the entire items by name/number lists and compared them. I added missing items and fixed capitalization. As far as I can tell, as of today, the lists match. --[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] 12:03, 16 November 2008 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Mistake? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I was wondering if there was a reason that all items have an extra How Obtained/Uses category? [[User:Towerlegion|Towerlegion]] 05:02, 24 November 2008 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | That the new item template introduced lately. The old template did not have the How Used and How Obtained as an integral part, the new one does. Items are in the process of being moved to the new template.--[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] 07:34, 24 November 2008 (MST) | ||
Latest revision as of 06:34, 24 November 2008
Can this be replaced by Category:Items?
As it is any new item needs to be added this page as well, whereas the category pages are updated automatically.
LeaChim 10:23, 30 December 2007 (MST)
cant we just have the template "auto add" newly added items to this page?--Reaper 15:38, 12 June 2008 (MST)
Seconded... It would be nice if pages like this were set up to work automatically through transclusion. The "Melee Weapon Summary Table" and all the rest of the equipment summary tables are also becoming out of date. --Tycho Everett 17:18, 1 July 2008 (MST)
Verification
While very bored (seminars do that) I went over the entire items by name/number lists and compared them. I added missing items and fixed capitalization. As far as I can tell, as of today, the lists match. --Muhandes 12:03, 16 November 2008 (MST)
Mistake?
I was wondering if there was a reason that all items have an extra How Obtained/Uses category? Towerlegion 05:02, 24 November 2008 (MST)
That the new item template introduced lately. The old template did not have the How Used and How Obtained as an integral part, the new one does. Items are in the process of being moved to the new template.--Muhandes 07:34, 24 November 2008 (MST)
