Category talk:Locations - Revision history

Muhandes at 07:36, 30 August 2009

2009-08-30T07:36:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:36, 30 August 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:I think it's better to make one or two new categories - patrol-ables and non-patrol-ables (names could be better, I know. ^^). Locations as a catch all is fine by me. --[[User:Alarion\|Alarion]] 18:57, 29 August 2009 (UTC)		:I think it's better to make one or two new categories - patrol-ables and non-patrol-ables (names could be better, I know. ^^). Locations as a catch all is fine by me. --[[User:Alarion\|Alarion]] 18:57, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
	:Well the description says that they are locations you can PATROL in, so we should change the description, or separate them. --[[User:PKProStudio\|PKProStudio]] 19:00, 29 August 2009 (UTC)		:Well the description says that they are locations you can PATROL in, so we should change the description, or separate them. --[[User:PKProStudio\|PKProStudio]] 19:00, 29 August 2009 (UTC)


	Another idea: What about a page that lists all the locations you can patrol in and the average experience the combat adventures give? The table could be expanded of course (number of noncombats, chips, and the like), but a general patrol table seems very helpful for newcomers and more experienced user alike.		Another idea: What about a page that lists all the locations you can patrol in and the average experience the combat adventures give? The table could be expanded of course (number of noncombats, chips, and the like), but a general patrol table seems very helpful for newcomers and more experienced user alike.
	(I'm thinking of something like this [http://kol.coldfront.net/thekolwiki/index.php/Area_Summary] here, just with experience instead of "safe moxie". Add a note "higher experience means more dangerous foes" and users will be able to figure out where to go themselves).		(I'm thinking of something like this [http://kol.coldfront.net/thekolwiki/index.php/Area_Summary] here, just with experience instead of "safe moxie". Add a note "higher experience means more dangerous foes" and users will be able to figure out where to go themselves).{{unsigned\|Alarion\|22:04, 29 August 2009}}
			: I agree in general, but there are many good and useful ideas. I think it should start as a User Guide, created and maintained by users. If it seems appropriate we will elevate it to Guide status and maintain it.--[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 07:36, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Alarion: new page?

2009-08-29T22:04:28Z

new page?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:04, 29 August 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:I think it's better to make one or two new categories - patrol-ables and non-patrol-ables (names could be better, I know. ^^). Locations as a catch all is fine by me. --[[User:Alarion\|Alarion]] 18:57, 29 August 2009 (UTC)		:I think it's better to make one or two new categories - patrol-ables and non-patrol-ables (names could be better, I know. ^^). Locations as a catch all is fine by me. --[[User:Alarion\|Alarion]] 18:57, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
	:Well the description says that they are locations you can PATROL in, so we should change the description, or separate them. --[[User:PKProStudio\|PKProStudio]] 19:00, 29 August 2009 (UTC)		:Well the description says that they are locations you can PATROL in, so we should change the description, or separate them. --[[User:PKProStudio\|PKProStudio]] 19:00, 29 August 2009 (UTC)


			Another idea: What about a page that lists all the locations you can patrol in and the average experience the combat adventures give? The table could be expanded of course (number of noncombats, chips, and the like), but a general patrol table seems very helpful for newcomers and more experienced user alike.
			(I'm thinking of something like this [http://kol.coldfront.net/thekolwiki/index.php/Area_Summary] here, just with experience instead of "safe moxie". Add a note "higher experience means more dangerous foes" and users will be able to figure out where to go themselves).

PKProStudio at 19:00, 29 August 2009

2009-08-29T19:00:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:00, 29 August 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Many of these cannot be patrolled in. We probably want to put them in a separate category. Ideas? --[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 18:42, 29 August 2009 (UTC)		Many of these cannot be patrolled in. We probably want to put them in a separate category. Ideas? --[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 18:42, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
	:I think it's better to make one or two new categories - patrol-ables and non-patrol-ables (names could be better, I know. ^^). Locations as a catch all is fine by me. --[[User:Alarion\|Alarion]] 18:57, 29 August 2009 (UTC)		:I think it's better to make one or two new categories - patrol-ables and non-patrol-ables (names could be better, I know. ^^). Locations as a catch all is fine by me. --[[User:Alarion\|Alarion]] 18:57, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
			:Well the description says that they are locations you can PATROL in, so we should change the description, or separate them. --[[User:PKProStudio\|PKProStudio]] 19:00, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Alarion at 18:57, 29 August 2009

2009-08-29T18:57:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:57, 29 August 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Many of these cannot be patrolled in. We probably want to put them in a separate category. Ideas? --[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 18:42, 29 August 2009 (UTC)		Many of these cannot be patrolled in. We probably want to put them in a separate category. Ideas? --[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 18:42, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
			:I think it's better to make one or two new categories - patrol-ables and non-patrol-ables (names could be better, I know. ^^). Locations as a catch all is fine by me. --[[User:Alarion\|Alarion]] 18:57, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Muhandes: ideas?

2009-08-29T18:42:13Z

ideas?

New page

Many of these cannot be patrolled in. We probably want to put them in a separate category. Ideas? --[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] 18:42, 29 August 2009 (UTC)