Talk:Egyptian knife fighter - Revision history

Muhandes at 15:28, 26 April 2010

2010-04-26T15:28:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:28, 26 April 2010
Line 61:		Line 61:
	\| 10 \|\| 9-12		\| 10 \|\| 9-12
	\|} Seems quite obvious it is 1*Level + (randomness). With a few more levels I might be able to see the randomness pattern. --[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 08:17, 22 April 2010 (UTC)		\|} Seems quite obvious it is 1*Level + (randomness). With a few more levels I might be able to see the randomness pattern. --[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 08:17, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

			This seems to fit well to Round(0.9Level)-Round(1.2Level), except missing 10 for level 8 --[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 15:28, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Muhandes at 15:20, 26 April 2010

2010-04-26T15:20:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:20, 26 April 2010
Line 58:		Line 58:
	\|-		\|-
	\| 9 \|\| 8-11		\| 9 \|\| 8-11
			\|-
			\| 10 \|\| 9-12
	\|} Seems quite obvious it is 1*Level + (randomness). With a few more levels I might be able to see the randomness pattern. --[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 08:17, 22 April 2010 (UTC)		\|} Seems quite obvious it is 1*Level + (randomness). With a few more levels I might be able to see the randomness pattern. --[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 08:17, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Muhandes at 23:23, 24 April 2010

2010-04-24T23:23:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:23, 24 April 2010
Line 56:		Line 56:
	\|-		\|-
	\| 8 \|\| 7-9		\| 8 \|\| 7-9
			\|-
			\| 9 \|\| 8-11
	\|} Seems quite obvious it is 1*Level + (randomness). With a few more levels I might be able to see the randomness pattern. --[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 08:17, 22 April 2010 (UTC)		\|} Seems quite obvious it is 1*Level + (randomness). With a few more levels I might be able to see the randomness pattern. --[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 08:17, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Muhandes at 13:23, 23 April 2010

2010-04-23T13:23:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:23, 23 April 2010
Line 54:		Line 54:
	\|-		\|-
	\| 7 \|\| 6-8		\| 7 \|\| 6-8
			\|-
			\| 8 \|\| 7-9
	\|} Seems quite obvious it is 1*Level + (randomness). With a few more levels I might be able to see the randomness pattern. --[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 08:17, 22 April 2010 (UTC)		\|} Seems quite obvious it is 1*Level + (randomness). With a few more levels I might be able to see the randomness pattern. --[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 08:17, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Muhandes at 08:17, 22 April 2010

2010-04-22T08:17:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:17, 22 April 2010
Line 37:		Line 37:

	8-11 damage at level 9--[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 21:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC)		8-11 damage at level 9--[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 21:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

			{\|
			! Level !! Damage
			\|-
			\| 1 \|\| 1
			\|-
			\| 2 \|\| 2
			\|-
			\| 3 \|\| 3-4
			\|-
			\| 4 \|\| 4-5
			\|-
			\| 5 \|\| 5-6
			\|-
			\| 6 \|\| 5-7
			\|-
			\| 7 \|\| 6-8
			\|} Seems quite obvious it is 1*Level + (randomness). With a few more levels I might be able to see the randomness pattern. --[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 08:17, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Muhandes: /* level dependent data */ new section

2009-06-01T21:34:04Z

level dependent data: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:34, 1 June 2009
Line 33:		Line 33:

	just message me ingame for their passwords.		just message me ingame for their passwords.

			== level dependent data ==

			8-11 damage at level 9--[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 21:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

The supernaturalist at 22:20, 2 May 2009

2009-05-02T22:20:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:20, 2 May 2009
Line 25:		Line 25:

	--[[User:JazzTap\|JazzTap]] 11:05, 30 April 2009 (UTC)		--[[User:JazzTap\|JazzTap]] 11:05, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

			feel free to use my alts:
			ph34rb0t
			k3wlb0t
			the bank of twilight
			and levels 3 to 5 Muh

			just message me ingame for their passwords.

JazzTap: My basic high-level spading data.

2009-04-30T11:05:49Z

My basic high-level spading data.

New page

Figured that while I was spading, I should fool around with the two items I never knew of until now. Found a manual of Egyptian knife fighting my first turn in the Triassic Park, so I decided to search for the smuggler and spade the fighter at the same time.

Coincidentally, I also made a table of the combat encounters at the Docks relative to each other, though I didn't manage to include noncombats. Those combats where my sidekick got in more than one hit, as denoted by 'and', have had the damage from that combat averaged before going into the type average.

Level 70 Gadgeteer, Egyptian knife fighter sidekick (assumed Level 40), no +sidekick effectiveness:

Sidekick damage:
Stevedora- 40, 36, 42, 46, 41, 48, 42, 37, 44, 36, 47, 42, 44, 44, 37, 43 - combats 16, avg dmg 41.8125 
Old Man- 46, 42, 47, 39, 41, 39, 47, 40, 42, 44 - combats 10, avg dmg 42.4 
Smuggler- 44, 38, 42, 41, 45, 42, 45 - combats 7, avg dmg 42.428571428571428571428571428571 
Shoreman- 42, 43, 44, 42, 38, 47, 43 and 42 - combats 7, avg dmg 42.642857142857142857142857142857 
Guard- 42, 46, 40, 44 and 46, 44, 40, 36, 48, 37 - combats 9, avg dmg 42 
totals- combats 49, avg dmg 42.256785714285714285714285714284

Then took my sidekick for a spin in S7G; these results are listed one enemy to one combat, as the combats are so long there. Again, no misses by my sidekick.

Sidekick damage:
crawler bot- 40, 39, 38, 37, 38, 38 - avg dmg 38.333333333333333333333333333333 
SnoBot- 44, 45, 45, 38, 39, 37 - avg dmg 41.333333333333333333333333333333 
totals- avg dmg 39.833333333333333333333333333333 

So, I think I can state with reasonable confidence (assuming RNG accounts for the 3-point drop between low-level and high-level foe damage taken) that the Egyption knife fighter sidekick gives guaranteed damage no matter the foe's stats.

Having no alts (yet), I can't be of help with the sidekick's leveling, sadly.

--[[User:JazzTap|JazzTap]] 11:05, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:28, 26 April 2010
Line 61:		Line 61:
	\| 10 \|\| 9-12		\| 10 \|\| 9-12
	\|} Seems quite obvious it is 1*Level + (randomness). With a few more levels I might be able to see the randomness pattern. --[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 08:17, 22 April 2010 (UTC)		\|} Seems quite obvious it is 1*Level + (randomness). With a few more levels I might be able to see the randomness pattern. --[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 08:17, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

			This seems to fit well to Round(0.9Level)-Round(1.2Level), except missing 10 for level 8 --[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 15:28, 26 April 2010 (UTC)