Talk:Quijote's spear - Revision history

Muhandes at 05:32, 27 May 2010

2010-05-27T05:32:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:32, 27 May 2010
Line 30:		Line 30:
	--[[User:JazzTap\|JazzTap]] 10:34, 30 April 2009 (UTC)		--[[User:JazzTap\|JazzTap]] 10:34, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
	: Yes, I went over it and it seems correct. With -10 offense and +2 toughness you'd expect less damage if there was also a -20 in effect.--[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 11:11, 30 April 2009 (UTC)		: Yes, I went over it and it seems correct. With -10 offense and +2 toughness you'd expect less damage if there was also a -20 in effect.--[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 11:11, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

			I removed "but they are not giants in the Quijote sense" because I felt it does not contribute to understanding the enchantment, and causes confusion if one does not know what "giants in the Quijote sense" is. Care to explain what you meant? --[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 05:32, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Muhandes at 11:11, 30 April 2009

2009-04-30T11:11:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:11, 30 April 2009
Line 29:		Line 29:

	--[[User:JazzTap\|JazzTap]] 10:34, 30 April 2009 (UTC)		--[[User:JazzTap\|JazzTap]] 10:34, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
			: Yes, I went over it and it seems correct. With -10 offense and +2 toughness you'd expect less damage if there was also a -20 in effect.--[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 11:11, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

JazzTap: Adding my spading data with regards to the GGG.

2009-04-30T10:34:58Z

Adding my spading data with regards to the GGG.

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:34, 30 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Removed 'The "defense against windmills" modifier is probably a joke' as it was confirmed as such (a long LONG time ago) and seems irrelevant. --[[User: Pantomine\|Pantomine]]		Removed 'The "defense against windmills" modifier is probably a joke' as it was confirmed as such (a long LONG time ago) and seems irrelevant. --[[User: Pantomine\|Pantomine]]
	*Other joke effects are still noted as such on other items. Furthermore a new player who wasn't here "a long LONG time ago" wouldn't necessarily be aware. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]]		*Other joke effects are still noted as such on other items. Furthermore a new player who wasn't here "a long LONG time ago" wouldn't necessarily be aware. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]]

			'''Grumpy Grey Giant:'''

			Run 1:
			robo cap, Quijote's spear, pseudo-chitin armor (just tryin' it out as a side foolery), xentrium gauntlets, xentrium boots;
			xentrium shield, shoehorn, the Scottish necklace, Ebon Eye of the Deep, Lexura Infinides D-8;
			Flea market trader sidekick
			Metal Detector, Fire Shield, Air Shield

			Damage: 78, 101, 78, 90, 90, 94, 80, 93, 85, 84, 93, 88, 99, 86, 90, 82, 86
			Used my EMP device for 548 damage. Immediately ran away.

			Run 2:
			robo cap, smart axe, pseudo-chitin armor, xentrium gauntlets, xentrium boots;
			coil of rope, shoehorn, the Scottish necklace, Ebon Eye of the Deep, Lexura Infinides D-8;
			Mimic sidekick
			Metal Detector, Fire Shield, Air Shield
			(-10 offensive power, +2 foe toughness)

			Damage: 82, 81, 89
			EMP for 1612 damage.
			Got bored, so I auto-attacked till' I came out with less than half HP and victory.

			Looking at these numbers, I don't see any boost in damage from Quijote's spear against GGGs, especially seeing as if anything, Run 2 should be doing less damage. Yeah, I didn't get much data that run, but I think the results rule out a major damage boost from the spear.

			If this isn't acceptable as serious spading, tell me what I did wrong so that I can fix it and get this outta the way.

			--[[User:JazzTap\|JazzTap]] 10:34, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Cristiona at 04:10, 7 February 2009

2009-02-07T04:10:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:10, 7 February 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Removed 'The "defense against windmills" modifier is probably a joke' as it was confirmed as such (a long LONG time ago) and seems irrelevant. --[[User: Pantomine\|Pantomine]]		Removed 'The "defense against windmills" modifier is probably a joke' as it was confirmed as such (a long LONG time ago) and seems irrelevant. --[[User: Pantomine\|Pantomine]]
			*Other joke effects are still noted as such on other items. Furthermore a new player who wasn't here "a long LONG time ago" wouldn't necessarily be aware. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]]

Pantomine: Removed Note

2009-02-07T04:09:05Z

Removed Note

New page

Removed 'The "defense against windmills" modifier is probably a joke' as it was confirmed as such (a long LONG time ago) and seems irrelevant. --[[User: Pantomine|Pantomine]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:32, 27 May 2010
Line 30:		Line 30:
	--[[User:JazzTap\|JazzTap]] 10:34, 30 April 2009 (UTC)		--[[User:JazzTap\|JazzTap]] 10:34, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
	: Yes, I went over it and it seems correct. With -10 offense and +2 toughness you'd expect less damage if there was also a -20 in effect.--[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 11:11, 30 April 2009 (UTC)		: Yes, I went over it and it seems correct. With -10 offense and +2 toughness you'd expect less damage if there was also a -20 in effect.--[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 11:11, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

			I removed "but they are not giants in the Quijote sense" because I felt it does not contribute to understanding the enchantment, and causes confusion if one does not know what "giants in the Quijote sense" is. Care to explain what you meant? --[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 05:32, 27 May 2010 (UTC)