Talk:TNT - Revision history

Alarion: Undo revision 24098 by Alarion (Talk) - had old version in browser. sorry about that.

2009-06-18T14:27:16Z

Undo revision 24098 by Alarion (Talk) - had old version in browser. sorry about that.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:27, 18 June 2009
Line 15:		Line 15:

	In the notes section it says "X is 2/3 of remaining foe HP." that obviously means it is dependant on foe HP... [[User:Zillow\|Zillow]]		In the notes section it says "X is 2/3 of remaining foe HP." that obviously means it is dependant on foe HP... [[User:Zillow\|Zillow]]
			: That's because I was quick to update it :) It used to say "2/3 of remaining HP".--[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 13:26, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
	:~~True enough, but that was added after SunWukong~~'s ~~comment~~. ;)--[[User:~~Alarion~~\|~~Alarion~~]] 14:26, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Alarion at 14:26, 18 June 2009

2009-06-18T14:26:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:26, 18 June 2009
Line 15:		Line 15:

	In the notes section it says "X is 2/3 of remaining foe HP." that obviously means it is dependant on foe HP... [[User:Zillow\|Zillow]]		In the notes section it says "X is 2/3 of remaining foe HP." that obviously means it is dependant on foe HP... [[User:Zillow\|Zillow]]
	: ~~That~~'s ~~because I was quick to update it :~~) ~~It used to say "2/3 of remaining HP".~~--[[User:~~Muhandes~~\|~~Muhandes~~]] 13:26, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
			:True enough, but that was added after SunWukong's comment. ;)--[[User:Alarion\|Alarion]] 14:26, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Muhandes at 13:26, 18 June 2009

2009-06-18T13:26:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:26, 18 June 2009
Line 15:		Line 15:

	In the notes section it says "X is 2/3 of remaining foe HP." that obviously means it is dependant on foe HP... [[User:Zillow\|Zillow]]		In the notes section it says "X is 2/3 of remaining foe HP." that obviously means it is dependant on foe HP... [[User:Zillow\|Zillow]]
			: That's because I was quick to update it :) It used to say "2/3 of remaining HP".--[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 13:26, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Zillow at 13:14, 18 June 2009

2009-06-18T13:14:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:14, 18 June 2009
Line 13:		Line 13:
	==Disambiguation==		==Disambiguation==
	This article doesn't state whether the damage done depends on the player's HP or the opponent HP. Please, someone to confirm then clarify. [[User:SunWukong\|SunWukong]] 08:38, 18 June 2009 (UTC)		This article doesn't state whether the damage done depends on the player's HP or the opponent HP. Please, someone to confirm then clarify. [[User:SunWukong\|SunWukong]] 08:38, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

			In the notes section it says "X is 2/3 of remaining foe HP." that obviously means it is dependant on foe HP... [[User:Zillow\|Zillow]]

SunWukong: /* Disambiguation */

2009-06-18T08:40:35Z

Disambiguation

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:40, 18 June 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:

	==Disambiguation==		==Disambiguation==
	This article doesn't state whether the damage done depends on the player's HP or the opponent HP. Please, someone to confirm [[User:SunWukong\|SunWukong]] 08:38, 18 June 2009 (UTC)		This article doesn't state whether the damage done depends on the player's HP or the opponent HP. Please, someone to confirm then clarify. [[User:SunWukong\|SunWukong]] 08:38, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

SunWukong at 08:38, 18 June 2009

2009-06-18T08:38:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:38, 18 June 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:

	: Sure does. Please sign in the future.--[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 06:13, 5 April 2009 (UTC)		: Sure does. Please sign in the future.--[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 06:13, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

			==Disambiguation==
			This article doesn't state whether the damage done depends on the player's HP or the opponent HP. Please, someone to confirm [[User:SunWukong\|SunWukong]] 08:38, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Muhandes at 06:13, 5 April 2009

2009-04-05T06:13:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:13, 5 April 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Certainly looks that way. Maybe test against a non-scaling foe where we have a good idea of the HP? Also, you'd want to test without any strikeback and without an attacking sidekick. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]]		Certainly looks that way. Maybe test against a non-scaling foe where we have a good idea of the HP? Also, you'd want to test without any strikeback and without an attacking sidekick. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]]

	oh come on! just look at those hits! it's obviously 66% of remaining health, maybe with some variability, but definitely around 2 thirds.		oh come on! just look at those hits! it's obviously 66% of remaining health, maybe with some variability, but definitely around 2 thirds.{{unsigned\|The supernaturalist\|04:10, 5 April 2009}}

			: Sure does. Please sign in the future.--[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 06:13, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

The supernaturalist at 04:10, 5 April 2009

2009-04-05T04:10:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:10, 5 April 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Certainly looks that way. Maybe test against a non-scaling foe where we have a good idea of the HP? Also, you'd want to test without any strikeback and without an attacking sidekick. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]]		Certainly looks that way. Maybe test against a non-scaling foe where we have a good idea of the HP? Also, you'd want to test without any strikeback and without an attacking sidekick. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]]

			oh come on! just look at those hits! it's obviously 66% of remaining health, maybe with some variability, but definitely around 2 thirds.

Cristiona at 04:05, 8 December 2008

2008-12-08T04:05:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:05, 8 December 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Hypo: Maybe a percentage of remaining health?		Hypo: Maybe a percentage of remaining health?
	--[[User:Zillow\|Zillow]]--		--[[User:Zillow\|Zillow]]--

			Certainly looks that way. Maybe test against a non-scaling foe where we have a good idea of the HP? Also, you'd want to test without any strikeback and without an attacking sidekick. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]]

Zillow: New page: Alright so Ryme said in the forum that some spaders should take a longer look at it. So I am going to start spading it and hopefully others will join in. Hits: 2997 against Grumpy Grey Gia...

2008-12-07T20:23:55Z

New page: Alright so Ryme said in the forum that some spaders should take a longer look at it. So I am going to start spading it and hopefully others will join in. Hits: 2997 against Grumpy Grey Gia...

New page

Alright so Ryme said in the forum that some spaders should take a longer look at it. So I am going to start spading it and hopefully others will join in.
Hits:
2997 against Grumpy Grey Giant, then 1019 against same one, then 354 against it again.
Hypo: Maybe a percentage of remaining health?
--[[User:Zillow|Zillow]]--