Talk:The Mick - Revision history

Patojonas: /* Drops Spading */ vest limits spaded

2012-04-21T17:06:21Z

Drops Spading: vest limits spaded

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:06, 21 April 2012
Line 20:		Line 20:

	'''On the table below, FTE stands for foe toughness equivalent, the FT equivalent of an effect calculated based on [[User:Valera\|Valera]]'s spading below.'''<br>		'''On the table below, FTE stands for foe toughness equivalent, the FT equivalent of an effect calculated based on [[User:Valera\|Valera]]'s spading below.'''<br>
	<span style="color:#ff0000;">'''SOFTWARES DON'T COUNT AS EFFECTS'''</span>		<span style="color:#ff0000;">'''SOFTWARES DON'T COUNT AS EFFECTS'''</span><br>
	* '''Values with * next to them were obtained before the aforementioned had been spaded.'''<br><br>
	{\| cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" border="1" align="left" style="text-align:center"		{\| cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" border="1" align="left" style="text-align:center"
	\|-		\|-
Line 28:		Line 27:
	\| Bounds \|\| ''Lower'' \|\| '''Higher''' \|\| ''Lower'' \|\| '''Higher''' \|\| ''Lower'' \|\| '''Higher''' \|\| ''Lower''		\| Bounds \|\| ''Lower'' \|\| '''Higher''' \|\| ''Lower'' \|\| '''Higher''' \|\| ''Lower'' \|\| '''Higher''' \|\| ''Lower''
	\|-		\|-
			\| Effects<br>FT \|\|''0<br>31''\|\|'''27<br>15'''\|\|''27<br>16''\|\|'''48<br>10'''\|\|''42<br>41''\|\|'''80<br>50'''\|\|''80<br>51''
	\| Effects<br>FT \|\|''0<br>31''\|\|'''27<br>15'''\|\|''27<br>16''\|\|'''48<br>10'''\|\|''42<br>41''\|\|'''44*<br>~~173~~'''\|\|''93<br>70''
	\|-style="background-color:#EFEFEF"		\|-style="background-color:#EFEFEF"
	\| FTE 1<br>(5~~effects~~ + FT)\|\| ''31''\|\| '''150'''\|\| ''151''\|\| '''250'''\|\| ''251''\|\| '''393'''\|\| ''~~535~~''		\| FTE<br>(50*Effects + FT)\|\| ''31''\|\| '''150'''\|\| ''151''\|\| '''250'''\|\| ''251''\|\| '''450'''\|\| ''451''
	\|-		<!-- \|-\| FTE 2<br>(4.75*Effects + FT)\|\|''31''\|\|'''142.5'''\|\|''144.25''\|\|'''238'''\|\|''240.5''\|\|'''430'''\|\|''431''\|- -->
	\| FTE 2<br>(4.75~~effects~~ + FT)\|\|''31''\|\|'''142.5'''\|\|''144.25''\|\|'''238'''\|\|''240.5''\|\|'''382'''\|\|''~~511.75~~''
	\|-
	\|}<br clear="all">		\|}<br clear="all">

Line 42:		Line 38:
	If you're considering effects only, yes. If you consider FT as well, no. 7 effects has an FTE 1 of 7*5=35, higher than the 31 FT that was needed in almost all the other combinations of X effects + Y FT Valera experienced( 4 effects and 12 FT is the reason for the FTE 2). The table is ordered by the FTE, not the combo of effects&FT. Was the explanation satisfactory? --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 11:21, 8 April 2012 (PDT)		If you're considering effects only, yes. If you consider FT as well, no. 7 effects has an FTE 1 of 7*5=35, higher than the 31 FT that was needed in almost all the other combinations of X effects + Y FT Valera experienced( 4 effects and 12 FT is the reason for the FTE 2). The table is ordered by the FTE, not the combo of effects&FT. Was the explanation satisfactory? --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 11:21, 8 April 2012 (PDT)

			FTE2 hidden since FTE1 has predictable and meaningful values. --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 10:06, 21 April 2012 (PDT)

	----		----
Line 133:		Line 130:
	42 effects, 41 FT = got chip, candy and bolt. 251 FTE1.<br>		42 effects, 41 FT = got chip, candy and bolt. 251 FTE1.<br>
	Judging by the current data, I'd say the vest needs either 401 or 451 FTE to drop, but I'm more inclined to the latter. --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 11:03, 16 April 2012 (PDT)		Judging by the current data, I'd say the vest needs either 401 or 451 FTE to drop, but I'm more inclined to the latter. --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 11:03, 16 April 2012 (PDT)

			80 effects, 50 FT = 450 FTE1 no vest message
			80 effects, 51 FT = 451 FTE1 - Chip, candy, bolt, vest. Mick gave 1725 XP (+56% + 7 XP). Judging by the first TNT, he had 1200 HP.<br>
			Also, it seemed to me, that the damage he inflicts depends more on actual FT than total FTE, but that might be due to the buffs I had. --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 10:06, 21 April 2012 (PDT)

	==Strategies & Combat Mechanics==		==Strategies & Combat Mechanics==
	My hypothesis is that if you fought The Mick the day before (and didn't beat him) then when you fight him the next day you'll have an absurdly good chance at beating him. Case in point: I lost to him yesterday. Today I went into combat with only my starting Slingshot (Gadgetteer). He owned me without any armor doing more than maxhp on the first hit. However, with some shoddy gear (105 total power, no other effects), I was able to last 6 rounds (he mostly did 12+12 dam). In that time my Slingshot did 85damage for a single hit, and 140damage for a double hit. --[[User:NardoLoopa\|NardoLoopa]] 06:07, 21 October 2010 (PDT)		My hypothesis is that if you fought The Mick the day before (and didn't beat him) then when you fight him the next day you'll have an absurdly good chance at beating him. Case in point: I lost to him yesterday. Today I went into combat with only my starting Slingshot (Gadgetteer). He owned me without any armor doing more than maxhp on the first hit. However, with some shoddy gear (105 total power, no other effects), I was able to last 6 rounds (he mostly did 12+12 dam). In that time my Slingshot did 85damage for a single hit, and 140damage for a double hit. --[[User:NardoLoopa\|NardoLoopa]] 06:07, 21 October 2010 (PDT)
	<br>-i doubt it. i've managed to lose to him 5 days in a row and he has not been easier after any given loss. --uewebawo 12:34, 22 October 2010 (EDT)		<br>-i doubt it. i've managed to lose to him 5 days in a row and he has not been easier after any given loss. --uewebawo 12:34, 22 October 2010 (EDT)

Patojonas: chip+candy | chip+candy+bolt limit determined

2012-04-16T18:03:59Z

chip+candy | chip+candy+bolt limit determined

Patojonas: software isn't an effect, coin|coin+candy limit determined

2012-04-16T16:57:14Z

software isn't an effect, coin|coin+candy limit determined

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:57, 16 April 2012
Line 19:		Line 19:
	==Drops Spading==		==Drops Spading==

	'''On the table below, FTE stands for foe toughness equivalent, the FT equivalent of an effect calculated based on [[User:Valera\|Valera]]'s spading below.'''		'''On the table below, FTE stands for foe toughness equivalent, the FT equivalent of an effect calculated based on [[User:Valera\|Valera]]'s spading below.'''<br>
			<span style="color:#ff0000;">'''SOFTWARES DON'T COUNT AS EFFECTS'''</span>
	'''~~When updating the table, place an asterisk (~~*) next to the ~~values where software is being used and counted as an effect. If not sure, please use it~~.'''		* '''Values with * next to them were obtained before the aforementioned had been spaded.'''<br><br>

	{\| cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" border="1" align="left" style="text-align:center"		{\| cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" border="1" align="left" style="text-align:center"
	\|-		\|-
Line 30:		Line 29:
	\|-		\|-

	\| Effects<br>FT \|\|''0<br>31''\|\|'''30<br>0'''\|\|''21<br>49''\|\|'''48<br>10'''\|\|''50<br>16''\|\|'''44<br>173'''\|\|''95<br>70''		\| Effects<br>FT \|\|''0<br>31''\|\|'''27<br>15'''\|\|''27<br>16''\|\|'''48<br>10'''\|\|''50<br>16''\|\|'''44*<br>173'''\|\|''93<br>70''
	\|-style="background-color:#EFEFEF"		\|-style="background-color:#EFEFEF"
	\| FTE 1<br>(5effects + FT)\|\| ''31''\|\| '''150'''\|\| ''154''\|\| '''250'''\|\| ''266''\|\| '''393'''\|\| ''545*''		\| FTE 1<br>(5effects + FT)\|\| ''31''\|\| '''150'''\|\| ''151''\|\| '''250'''\|\| ''266''\|\| '''393'''\|\| ''535''
	\|-		\|-
	\| FTE 2<br>(4.75effects + FT)\|\|''31''\|\|'''142.5'''\|\|''~~148~~.75''\|\|'''238'''\|\|''253.5''\|\|'''382'''\|\|''521*''		\| FTE 2<br>(4.75effects + FT)\|\|''31''\|\|'''142.5'''\|\|''144.25''\|\|'''238'''\|\|''253.5''\|\|'''382'''\|\|''511.75''
	\|-		\|-
	\|}<br clear="all">		\|}<br clear="all">
Line 125:		Line 124:

	48 effects (no softwares), 10 FT(buffs) Level 11, 3 mettle run - Chip and candy as expected. Mick gave 1413XP (+56% +9xp). I suspect one more FT (251) would have been enough for the bolt, will check next time --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 09:10, 12 April 2012 (PDT)		48 effects (no softwares), 10 FT(buffs) Level 11, 3 mettle run - Chip and candy as expected. Mick gave 1413XP (+56% +9xp). I suspect one more FT (251) would have been enough for the bolt, will check next time --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 09:10, 12 April 2012 (PDT)

			4 effects, 2 softwares and 1 FT = no coin message<br>
			4 effects, 2 softwares and 10 FT = no coin message<br>
			4 effects, 2 softwares and 11 FT = coin message -> <span style="color:#ff0000;">'''SOFTWARES DON'T COUNT AS EFFECTS'''</span><br>
			27 effects, 15 FT = coin message. 150 FTE1<br>
			27 effects, 16FT = cleaning up message (Man, what a jerk). 151 FTE1 --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 09:57, 16 April 2012 (PDT)

	==Strategies & Combat Mechanics==		==Strategies & Combat Mechanics==
	My hypothesis is that if you fought The Mick the day before (and didn't beat him) then when you fight him the next day you'll have an absurdly good chance at beating him. Case in point: I lost to him yesterday. Today I went into combat with only my starting Slingshot (Gadgetteer). He owned me without any armor doing more than maxhp on the first hit. However, with some shoddy gear (105 total power, no other effects), I was able to last 6 rounds (he mostly did 12+12 dam). In that time my Slingshot did 85damage for a single hit, and 140damage for a double hit. --[[User:NardoLoopa\|NardoLoopa]] 06:07, 21 October 2010 (PDT)		My hypothesis is that if you fought The Mick the day before (and didn't beat him) then when you fight him the next day you'll have an absurdly good chance at beating him. Case in point: I lost to him yesterday. Today I went into combat with only my starting Slingshot (Gadgetteer). He owned me without any armor doing more than maxhp on the first hit. However, with some shoddy gear (105 total power, no other effects), I was able to last 6 rounds (he mostly did 12+12 dam). In that time my Slingshot did 85damage for a single hit, and 140damage for a double hit. --[[User:NardoLoopa\|NardoLoopa]] 06:07, 21 October 2010 (PDT)
	<br>-i doubt it. i've managed to lose to him 5 days in a row and he has not been easier after any given loss. --uewebawo 12:34, 22 October 2010 (EDT)		<br>-i doubt it. i've managed to lose to him 5 days in a row and he has not been easier after any given loss. --uewebawo 12:34, 22 October 2010 (EDT)

Patojonas at 16:10, 12 April 2012

2012-04-12T16:10:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:10, 12 April 2012
Line 30:		Line 30:
	\|-		\|-

	\| Effects<br>FT \|\|''0<br>31''\|\|'''30<br>0'''\|\|''21<br>49''\|\|'''27<br>~~107.5~~'''\|\|''50<br>16''\|\|'''44<br>173'''\|\|''95*<br>70''		\| Effects<br>FT \|\|''0<br>31''\|\|'''30<br>0'''\|\|''21<br>49''\|\|'''48<br>10'''\|\|''50<br>16''\|\|'''44<br>173'''\|\|''95<br>70''
	\|-style="background-color:#EFEFEF"		\|-style="background-color:#EFEFEF"
	\| FTE 1<br>(5effects + FT)\|\| ''31''\|\| '''150'''\|\| ''154''\|\| '''242.5'''\|\| ''266''\|\| '''393'''\|\| ''545''		\| FTE 1<br>(5effects + FT)\|\| ''31''\|\| '''150'''\|\| ''154''\|\| '''250'''\|\| ''266''\|\| '''393'''\|\| ''545*''
	\|-		\|-
	\| FTE 2<br>(4.75effects + FT)\|\|''31''\|\|'''142.5'''\|\|''148.75''\|\|'''235.75'''\|\|''253.5''\|\|'''382'''\|\|''521''		\| FTE 2<br>(4.75effects + FT)\|\|''31''\|\|'''142.5'''\|\|''148.75''\|\|'''238'''\|\|''253.5''\|\|'''382'''\|\|''521*''
	\|-		\|-
	\|}<br clear="all">		\|}<br clear="all">
Line 123:		Line 123:

	Replaced the obsolete data above ( added before Ryme changed the drop requirements) with a table systematizing most of the entries so far (except for the ones that looked dubious to me), hope you like ;) --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 11:41, 7 April 2012 (PDT)		Replaced the obsolete data above ( added before Ryme changed the drop requirements) with a table systematizing most of the entries so far (except for the ones that looked dubious to me), hope you like ;) --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 11:41, 7 April 2012 (PDT)

			48 effects (no softwares), 10 FT(buffs) Level 11, 3 mettle run - Chip and candy as expected. Mick gave 1413XP (+56% +9xp). I suspect one more FT (251) would have been enough for the bolt, will check next time --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 09:10, 12 April 2012 (PDT)

	==Strategies & Combat Mechanics==		==Strategies & Combat Mechanics==
	My hypothesis is that if you fought The Mick the day before (and didn't beat him) then when you fight him the next day you'll have an absurdly good chance at beating him. Case in point: I lost to him yesterday. Today I went into combat with only my starting Slingshot (Gadgetteer). He owned me without any armor doing more than maxhp on the first hit. However, with some shoddy gear (105 total power, no other effects), I was able to last 6 rounds (he mostly did 12+12 dam). In that time my Slingshot did 85damage for a single hit, and 140damage for a double hit. --[[User:NardoLoopa\|NardoLoopa]] 06:07, 21 October 2010 (PDT)		My hypothesis is that if you fought The Mick the day before (and didn't beat him) then when you fight him the next day you'll have an absurdly good chance at beating him. Case in point: I lost to him yesterday. Today I went into combat with only my starting Slingshot (Gadgetteer). He owned me without any armor doing more than maxhp on the first hit. However, with some shoddy gear (105 total power, no other effects), I was able to last 6 rounds (he mostly did 12+12 dam). In that time my Slingshot did 85damage for a single hit, and 140damage for a double hit. --[[User:NardoLoopa\|NardoLoopa]] 06:07, 21 October 2010 (PDT)
	<br>-i doubt it. i've managed to lose to him 5 days in a row and he has not been easier after any given loss. --uewebawo 12:34, 22 October 2010 (EDT)		<br>-i doubt it. i've managed to lose to him 5 days in a row and he has not been easier after any given loss. --uewebawo 12:34, 22 October 2010 (EDT)

Patojonas at 18:21, 8 April 2012

2012-04-08T18:21:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:21, 8 April 2012
Line 40:		Line 40:

	I may not be reading this chart right, but Val pulled a coin with 7 effects and no FT. Shouldn't 7 effects be the lower bound for getting a coin drop? [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]] 19:49, 7 April 2012 (PDT)		I may not be reading this chart right, but Val pulled a coin with 7 effects and no FT. Shouldn't 7 effects be the lower bound for getting a coin drop? [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]] 19:49, 7 April 2012 (PDT)

			If you're considering effects only, yes. If you consider FT as well, no. 7 effects has an FTE 1 of 7*5=35, higher than the 31 FT that was needed in almost all the other combinations of X effects + Y FT Valera experienced( 4 effects and 12 FT is the reason for the FTE 2). The table is ordered by the FTE, not the combo of effects&FT. Was the explanation satisfactory? --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 11:21, 8 April 2012 (PDT)


	----		----

Cristiona: /* Drops Spading */

2012-04-08T02:49:34Z

Drops Spading

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:49, 8 April 2012
Line 38:		Line 38:
	\|}<br clear="all">		\|}<br clear="all">


			I may not be reading this chart right, but Val pulled a coin with 7 effects and no FT. Shouldn't 7 effects be the lower bound for getting a coin drop? [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]] 19:49, 7 April 2012 (PDT)

	----		----

Patojonas: replaced obsolete data with a table, hope it was ok to remove it

2012-04-07T18:41:06Z

replaced obsolete data with a table, hope it was ok to remove it

Show changes

Patojonas at 18:22, 7 April 2012

2012-04-07T18:22:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:22, 7 April 2012
Line 155:		Line 155:

	29 effects, 74 FT - chip, candy --[[User:Shikao\|Shikao]] 11:30, 21 January 2011 (PST)		29 effects, 74 FT - chip, candy --[[User:Shikao\|Shikao]] 11:30, 21 January 2011 (PST)

	43 effect, 140,5 FT - chip, candy, bolt --[[User:Shikao\|Shikao]] 05:20, 13 February 2011 (PST)		43 effect, 140,5 FT - chip, candy, bolt --[[User:Shikao\|Shikao]] 05:20, 13 February 2011 (PST)

Line 163:		Line 164:
	57 effects, 30 FT(buffs) + 40 FT(gears) Level 11, 3 mettle run - Chip, candy, bolt. The Mick gave me a bit over 1500 XP. Both this and the previous entry are affected by +56% +5 XP buff (Keen Observation, Euphoria, In comunicando) --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 05:17, 2 April 2012 (PDT)		57 effects, 30 FT(buffs) + 40 FT(gears) Level 11, 3 mettle run - Chip, candy, bolt. The Mick gave me a bit over 1500 XP. Both this and the previous entry are affected by +56% +5 XP buff (Keen Observation, Euphoria, In comunicando) --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 05:17, 2 April 2012 (PDT)

	47 effects, ~~30FT~~(buffs) + 50 FT(gears) Level 11, 3 mettle run - Chip, candy, bolt. Mick gave 1030 XP. ~~Ths~~ value is affected by +6% +5 XP buff. --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 07:06, 4 April 2012 (PDT)		47 effects, 30 FT(buffs) + 50 FT(gears) Level 11, 3 mettle run - Chip, candy, bolt. Mick gave 1030 XP. This value is affected by +6% +5 XP buff. --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 07:06, 4 April 2012 (PDT)

			50 effects, 10 FT(buffs) + 6 FT(gears) Level 11, 3 mettle run - Chip, candy, bolt. Mick gave 993 XP. This value is affected by +6% +11 XP buff. --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 11:22, 7 April 2012 (PDT)

	----		----

Patojonas at 14:06, 4 April 2012

2012-04-04T14:06:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:06, 4 April 2012
Line 159:		Line 159:
	44 effects, 173 FT - Chip, candy, bolt. I tried without wearing a weapon, don't think that's done anything.--[[User:Strlikecrazy\|Strlikecrazy]] 02:50, 6 March 2011 (PST)		44 effects, 173 FT - Chip, candy, bolt. I tried without wearing a weapon, don't think that's done anything.--[[User:Strlikecrazy\|Strlikecrazy]] 02:50, 6 March 2011 (PST)

	95 effects, 40 FT(buffs) + 30 FT(gears) Level 11, 3 mettle run - Chip, candy, bolt, vest. The Mick gave me 1876 XP. Clearly the effects are more important than the FT itself mainly because ~~they~~ also increase your statuses to which the Mick scales --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 13:47, 30 March 2012 (PDT)		95 effects, 40 FT(buffs) + 30 FT(gears) Level 11, 3 mettle run - Chip, candy, bolt, vest. The Mick gave me 1876 XP. Clearly the effects are more important than the FT itself mainly because some of them also increase your statuses to which the Mick scales --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 13:47, 30 March 2012 (PDT)

	57 effects, 30 FT(buffs) + 40 FT(gears) Level 11, 3 mettle run - Chip, candy, bolt. The Mick gave me a bit over 1500 XP.. Both this and the previous entry are affected by +56% +5 XP buff (Keen Observation, Euphoria, In comunicando) --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 05:17, 2 April 2012 (PDT)		57 effects, 30 FT(buffs) + 40 FT(gears) Level 11, 3 mettle run - Chip, candy, bolt. The Mick gave me a bit over 1500 XP. Both this and the previous entry are affected by +56% +5 XP buff (Keen Observation, Euphoria, In comunicando) --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 05:17, 2 April 2012 (PDT)

			47 effects, 30FT(buffs) + 50 FT(gears) Level 11, 3 mettle run - Chip, candy, bolt. Mick gave 1030 XP. Ths value is affected by +6% +5 XP buff. --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 07:06, 4 April 2012 (PDT)
	----		----

Patojonas at 12:17, 2 April 2012

2012-04-02T12:17:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:17, 2 April 2012
Line 161:		Line 161:
	95 effects, 40 FT(buffs) + 30 FT(gears) Level 11, 3 mettle run - Chip, candy, bolt, vest. The Mick gave me 1876 XP. Clearly the effects are more important than the FT itself mainly because they also increase your statuses to which the Mick scales --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 13:47, 30 March 2012 (PDT)		95 effects, 40 FT(buffs) + 30 FT(gears) Level 11, 3 mettle run - Chip, candy, bolt, vest. The Mick gave me 1876 XP. Clearly the effects are more important than the FT itself mainly because they also increase your statuses to which the Mick scales --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 13:47, 30 March 2012 (PDT)

			57 effects, 30 FT(buffs) + 40 FT(gears) Level 11, 3 mettle run - Chip, candy, bolt. The Mick gave me a bit over 1500 XP.. Both this and the previous entry are affected by +56% +5 XP buff (Keen Observation, Euphoria, In comunicando) --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 05:17, 2 April 2012 (PDT)
	----		----

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:22, 7 April 2012
Line 155:		Line 155:

	29 effects, 74 FT - chip, candy --[[User:Shikao\|Shikao]] 11:30, 21 January 2011 (PST)		29 effects, 74 FT - chip, candy --[[User:Shikao\|Shikao]] 11:30, 21 January 2011 (PST)

	43 effect, 140,5 FT - chip, candy, bolt --[[User:Shikao\|Shikao]] 05:20, 13 February 2011 (PST)		43 effect, 140,5 FT - chip, candy, bolt --[[User:Shikao\|Shikao]] 05:20, 13 February 2011 (PST)

Line 163:		Line 164:
	57 effects, 30 FT(buffs) + 40 FT(gears) Level 11, 3 mettle run - Chip, candy, bolt. The Mick gave me a bit over 1500 XP. Both this and the previous entry are affected by +56% +5 XP buff (Keen Observation, Euphoria, In comunicando) --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 05:17, 2 April 2012 (PDT)		57 effects, 30 FT(buffs) + 40 FT(gears) Level 11, 3 mettle run - Chip, candy, bolt. The Mick gave me a bit over 1500 XP. Both this and the previous entry are affected by +56% +5 XP buff (Keen Observation, Euphoria, In comunicando) --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 05:17, 2 April 2012 (PDT)

	47 effects, ~~30FT~~(buffs) + 50 FT(gears) Level 11, 3 mettle run - Chip, candy, bolt. Mick gave 1030 XP. ~~Ths~~ value is affected by +6% +5 XP buff. --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 07:06, 4 April 2012 (PDT)		47 effects, 30 FT(buffs) + 50 FT(gears) Level 11, 3 mettle run - Chip, candy, bolt. Mick gave 1030 XP. This value is affected by +6% +5 XP buff. --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 07:06, 4 April 2012 (PDT)

			50 effects, 10 FT(buffs) + 6 FT(gears) Level 11, 3 mettle run - Chip, candy, bolt. Mick gave 993 XP. This value is affected by +6% +11 XP buff. --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 11:22, 7 April 2012 (PDT)

	----		----

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:06, 4 April 2012
Line 159:		Line 159:
	44 effects, 173 FT - Chip, candy, bolt. I tried without wearing a weapon, don't think that's done anything.--[[User:Strlikecrazy\|Strlikecrazy]] 02:50, 6 March 2011 (PST)		44 effects, 173 FT - Chip, candy, bolt. I tried without wearing a weapon, don't think that's done anything.--[[User:Strlikecrazy\|Strlikecrazy]] 02:50, 6 March 2011 (PST)

	95 effects, 40 FT(buffs) + 30 FT(gears) Level 11, 3 mettle run - Chip, candy, bolt, vest. The Mick gave me 1876 XP. Clearly the effects are more important than the FT itself mainly because ~~they~~ also increase your statuses to which the Mick scales --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 13:47, 30 March 2012 (PDT)		95 effects, 40 FT(buffs) + 30 FT(gears) Level 11, 3 mettle run - Chip, candy, bolt, vest. The Mick gave me 1876 XP. Clearly the effects are more important than the FT itself mainly because some of them also increase your statuses to which the Mick scales --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 13:47, 30 March 2012 (PDT)

	57 effects, 30 FT(buffs) + 40 FT(gears) Level 11, 3 mettle run - Chip, candy, bolt. The Mick gave me a bit over 1500 XP.. Both this and the previous entry are affected by +56% +5 XP buff (Keen Observation, Euphoria, In comunicando) --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 05:17, 2 April 2012 (PDT)		57 effects, 30 FT(buffs) + 40 FT(gears) Level 11, 3 mettle run - Chip, candy, bolt. The Mick gave me a bit over 1500 XP. Both this and the previous entry are affected by +56% +5 XP buff (Keen Observation, Euphoria, In comunicando) --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 05:17, 2 April 2012 (PDT)

			47 effects, 30FT(buffs) + 50 FT(gears) Level 11, 3 mettle run - Chip, candy, bolt. Mick gave 1030 XP. Ths value is affected by +6% +5 XP buff. --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 07:06, 4 April 2012 (PDT)
	----		----

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:03, 16 April 2012
Line 29:		Line 29:
	\|-		\|-

	\| Effects<br>FT \|\|''0<br>31''\|\|'''27<br>15'''\|\|''27<br>16''\|\|'''48<br>10'''\|\|''50<br>16''\|\|'''44*<br>173'''\|\|''93<br>70''		\| Effects<br>FT \|\|''0<br>31''\|\|'''27<br>15'''\|\|''27<br>16''\|\|'''48<br>10'''\|\|''42<br>41''\|\|'''44*<br>173'''\|\|''93<br>70''
	\|-style="background-color:#EFEFEF"		\|-style="background-color:#EFEFEF"
	\| FTE 1<br>(5effects + FT)\|\| ''31''\|\| '''150'''\|\| ''151''\|\| '''250'''\|\| ''~~266~~''\|\| '''393'''\|\| ''535''		\| FTE 1<br>(5effects + FT)\|\| ''31''\|\| '''150'''\|\| ''151''\|\| '''250'''\|\| ''251''\|\| '''393'''\|\| ''535''
	\|-		\|-
	\| FTE 2<br>(4.75effects + FT)\|\|''31''\|\|'''142.5'''\|\|''144.25''\|\|'''238'''\|\|''~~253~~.5''\|\|'''382'''\|\|''511.75''		\| FTE 2<br>(4.75effects + FT)\|\|''31''\|\|'''142.5'''\|\|''144.25''\|\|'''238'''\|\|''240.5''\|\|'''382'''\|\|''511.75''
	\|-		\|-
	\|}<br clear="all">		\|}<br clear="all">
Line 130:		Line 130:
	27 effects, 15 FT = coin message. 150 FTE1<br>		27 effects, 15 FT = coin message. 150 FTE1<br>
	27 effects, 16FT = cleaning up message (Man, what a jerk). 151 FTE1 --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 09:57, 16 April 2012 (PDT)		27 effects, 16FT = cleaning up message (Man, what a jerk). 151 FTE1 --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 09:57, 16 April 2012 (PDT)

			42 effects, 41 FT = got chip, candy and bolt. 251 FTE1.<br>
			Judging by the current data, I'd say the vest needs either 401 or 451 FTE to drop, but I'm more inclined to the latter. --[[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 11:03, 16 April 2012 (PDT)

	==Strategies & Combat Mechanics==		==Strategies & Combat Mechanics==
	My hypothesis is that if you fought The Mick the day before (and didn't beat him) then when you fight him the next day you'll have an absurdly good chance at beating him. Case in point: I lost to him yesterday. Today I went into combat with only my starting Slingshot (Gadgetteer). He owned me without any armor doing more than maxhp on the first hit. However, with some shoddy gear (105 total power, no other effects), I was able to last 6 rounds (he mostly did 12+12 dam). In that time my Slingshot did 85damage for a single hit, and 140damage for a double hit. --[[User:NardoLoopa\|NardoLoopa]] 06:07, 21 October 2010 (PDT)		My hypothesis is that if you fought The Mick the day before (and didn't beat him) then when you fight him the next day you'll have an absurdly good chance at beating him. Case in point: I lost to him yesterday. Today I went into combat with only my starting Slingshot (Gadgetteer). He owned me without any armor doing more than maxhp on the first hit. However, with some shoddy gear (105 total power, no other effects), I was able to last 6 rounds (he mostly did 12+12 dam). In that time my Slingshot did 85damage for a single hit, and 140damage for a double hit. --[[User:NardoLoopa\|NardoLoopa]] 06:07, 21 October 2010 (PDT)
	<br>-i doubt it. i've managed to lose to him 5 days in a row and he has not been easier after any given loss. --uewebawo 12:34, 22 October 2010 (EDT)		<br>-i doubt it. i've managed to lose to him 5 days in a row and he has not been easier after any given loss. --uewebawo 12:34, 22 October 2010 (EDT)