Talk:The Wok of Stars - Revision history

Patojonas at 20:48, 3 January 2015

2015-01-03T20:48:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:48, 3 January 2015
Line 314:		Line 314:
	::: I also think text should be left in. No text = not searchable. Value of searchability will only go up as the page size goes up. --[[User:XKiv\|XKiv]] ([[User talk:XKiv\|talk]]) 10:41, 3 January 2015 (PST)		::: I also think text should be left in. No text = not searchable. Value of searchability will only go up as the page size goes up. --[[User:XKiv\|XKiv]] ([[User talk:XKiv\|talk]]) 10:41, 3 January 2015 (PST)
	::::We could put a condensed chart on the main page, with a link to a subpage ("The Wok of Stars/Previous Offerings") that contains the full (searchable) chart. --[[User:Hoyifung04\|hoyifung04]] ([[User talk:Hoyifung04\|talk]]) 12:09, 3 January 2015 (PST)		::::We could put a condensed chart on the main page, with a link to a subpage ("The Wok of Stars/Previous Offerings") that contains the full (searchable) chart. --[[User:Hoyifung04\|hoyifung04]] ([[User talk:Hoyifung04\|talk]]) 12:09, 3 January 2015 (PST)
			::::That would complicate things more than no names me thinks :P [[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 12:48, 3 January 2015 (PST)

Hoyifung04: /* Crowding */

2015-01-03T20:09:28Z

Crowding

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:09, 3 January 2015
Line 313:		Line 313:
	::- I don't like not having the names because it makes life harder for newbies whenever I point them at the wok page and mention an iotm. It takes some space but is more intuitive and seems to me to be the right amount of information. About the chronological order....don't really have a strong opinion about it but I like chronological best. [[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 03:21, 3 January 2015 (PST)		::- I don't like not having the names because it makes life harder for newbies whenever I point them at the wok page and mention an iotm. It takes some space but is more intuitive and seems to me to be the right amount of information. About the chronological order....don't really have a strong opinion about it but I like chronological best. [[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 03:21, 3 January 2015 (PST)
	::: I also think text should be left in. No text = not searchable. Value of searchability will only go up as the page size goes up. --[[User:XKiv\|XKiv]] ([[User talk:XKiv\|talk]]) 10:41, 3 January 2015 (PST)		::: I also think text should be left in. No text = not searchable. Value of searchability will only go up as the page size goes up. --[[User:XKiv\|XKiv]] ([[User talk:XKiv\|talk]]) 10:41, 3 January 2015 (PST)
			::::We could put a condensed chart on the main page, with a link to a subpage ("The Wok of Stars/Previous Offerings") that contains the full (searchable) chart. --[[User:Hoyifung04\|hoyifung04]] ([[User talk:Hoyifung04\|talk]]) 12:09, 3 January 2015 (PST)

XKiv at 18:41, 3 January 2015

2015-01-03T18:41:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:41, 3 January 2015
Line 312:		Line 312:
	:I think we can all agree that the '''transpose''' and '''no prices''' options are good, and that the ''no images'' image is bad, which leaves two main options to discuss: '''reverse chrono''' and '''no text'''; the latter also has a option for '''single-line'''. Opinions? --[[User:Hoyifung04\|hoyifung04]] ([[User talk:Hoyifung04\|talk]]) 21:40, 2 January 2015 (PST)		:I think we can all agree that the '''transpose''' and '''no prices''' options are good, and that the ''no images'' image is bad, which leaves two main options to discuss: '''reverse chrono''' and '''no text'''; the latter also has a option for '''single-line'''. Opinions? --[[User:Hoyifung04\|hoyifung04]] ([[User talk:Hoyifung04\|talk]]) 21:40, 2 January 2015 (PST)
	::- I don't like not having the names because it makes life harder for newbies whenever I point them at the wok page and mention an iotm. It takes some space but is more intuitive and seems to me to be the right amount of information. About the chronological order....don't really have a strong opinion about it but I like chronological best. [[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 03:21, 3 January 2015 (PST)		::- I don't like not having the names because it makes life harder for newbies whenever I point them at the wok page and mention an iotm. It takes some space but is more intuitive and seems to me to be the right amount of information. About the chronological order....don't really have a strong opinion about it but I like chronological best. [[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 03:21, 3 January 2015 (PST)
			::: I also think text should be left in. No text = not searchable. Value of searchability will only go up as the page size goes up. --[[User:XKiv\|XKiv]] ([[User talk:XKiv\|talk]]) 10:41, 3 January 2015 (PST)

Patojonas: opinions

2015-01-03T11:21:32Z

opinions

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:21, 3 January 2015
Line 311:		Line 311:
	:I think I like "Transposed, no prices, reverse chrono, no text" best. It's the most concise. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]] ([[User talk:Cristiona\|talk]]) 21:01, 2 January 2015 (PST)		:I think I like "Transposed, no prices, reverse chrono, no text" best. It's the most concise. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]] ([[User talk:Cristiona\|talk]]) 21:01, 2 January 2015 (PST)
	:I think we can all agree that the '''transpose''' and '''no prices''' options are good, and that the ''no images'' image is bad, which leaves two main options to discuss: '''reverse chrono''' and '''no text'''; the latter also has a option for '''single-line'''. Opinions? --[[User:Hoyifung04\|hoyifung04]] ([[User talk:Hoyifung04\|talk]]) 21:40, 2 January 2015 (PST)		:I think we can all agree that the '''transpose''' and '''no prices''' options are good, and that the ''no images'' image is bad, which leaves two main options to discuss: '''reverse chrono''' and '''no text'''; the latter also has a option for '''single-line'''. Opinions? --[[User:Hoyifung04\|hoyifung04]] ([[User talk:Hoyifung04\|talk]]) 21:40, 2 January 2015 (PST)
			::- I don't like not having the names because it makes life harder for newbies whenever I point them at the wok page and mention an iotm. It takes some space but is more intuitive and seems to me to be the right amount of information. About the chronological order....don't really have a strong opinion about it but I like chronological best. [[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 03:21, 3 January 2015 (PST)

Hoyifung04: /* Crowding */

2015-01-03T05:43:01Z

Crowding

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:43, 3 January 2015
Line 310:		Line 310:
	:: I like the most compact table, the one on the bottom of hoyifung04's sandbox page. [[User:Sanjuro\|Sanjuro]] ([[User talk:Sanjuro\|talk]]) 18:52, 2 January 2015 (PST)		:: I like the most compact table, the one on the bottom of hoyifung04's sandbox page. [[User:Sanjuro\|Sanjuro]] ([[User talk:Sanjuro\|talk]]) 18:52, 2 January 2015 (PST)
	:I think I like "Transposed, no prices, reverse chrono, no text" best. It's the most concise. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]] ([[User talk:Cristiona\|talk]]) 21:01, 2 January 2015 (PST)		:I think I like "Transposed, no prices, reverse chrono, no text" best. It's the most concise. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]] ([[User talk:Cristiona\|talk]]) 21:01, 2 January 2015 (PST)
	:I think we can all agree that the '''transpose''' and '''no prices''' options are good, and that the ''no images'' image is bad, which leaves two options to discuss: '''reverse chrono''' and '''single-line'''. Opinions? --[[User:Hoyifung04\|hoyifung04]] ([[User talk:Hoyifung04\|talk]]) 21:40, 2 January 2015 (PST)		:I think we can all agree that the '''transpose''' and '''no prices''' options are good, and that the ''no images'' image is bad, which leaves two main options to discuss: '''reverse chrono''' and '''no text'''; the latter also has a option for '''single-line'''. Opinions? --[[User:Hoyifung04\|hoyifung04]] ([[User talk:Hoyifung04\|talk]]) 21:40, 2 January 2015 (PST)

Hoyifung04: /* Crowding */

2015-01-03T05:40:17Z

Crowding

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:40, 3 January 2015
Line 310:		Line 310:
	:: I like the most compact table, the one on the bottom of hoyifung04's sandbox page. [[User:Sanjuro\|Sanjuro]] ([[User talk:Sanjuro\|talk]]) 18:52, 2 January 2015 (PST)		:: I like the most compact table, the one on the bottom of hoyifung04's sandbox page. [[User:Sanjuro\|Sanjuro]] ([[User talk:Sanjuro\|talk]]) 18:52, 2 January 2015 (PST)
	:I think I like "Transposed, no prices, reverse chrono, no text" best. It's the most concise. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]] ([[User talk:Cristiona\|talk]]) 21:01, 2 January 2015 (PST)		:I think I like "Transposed, no prices, reverse chrono, no text" best. It's the most concise. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]] ([[User talk:Cristiona\|talk]]) 21:01, 2 January 2015 (PST)
			:I think we can all agree that the '''transpose''' and '''no prices''' options are good, and that the ''no images'' image is bad, which leaves two options to discuss: '''reverse chrono''' and '''single-line'''. Opinions? --[[User:Hoyifung04\|hoyifung04]] ([[User talk:Hoyifung04\|talk]]) 21:40, 2 January 2015 (PST)

Cristiona at 05:01, 3 January 2015

2015-01-03T05:01:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:01, 3 January 2015
Line 309:		Line 309:
	::I like Transposed, no prices, but with the names below. [[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 16:22, 2 January 2015 (PST)		::I like Transposed, no prices, but with the names below. [[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 16:22, 2 January 2015 (PST)
	:: I like the most compact table, the one on the bottom of hoyifung04's sandbox page. [[User:Sanjuro\|Sanjuro]] ([[User talk:Sanjuro\|talk]]) 18:52, 2 January 2015 (PST)		:: I like the most compact table, the one on the bottom of hoyifung04's sandbox page. [[User:Sanjuro\|Sanjuro]] ([[User talk:Sanjuro\|talk]]) 18:52, 2 January 2015 (PST)
			:I think I like "Transposed, no prices, reverse chrono, no text" best. It's the most concise. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]] ([[User talk:Cristiona\|talk]]) 21:01, 2 January 2015 (PST)

Sanjuro: discussion

2015-01-03T02:52:46Z

discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:52, 3 January 2015
Line 308:		Line 308:
	I like just images with no prices. Clean and easy to find a specific one if you're looking for it. --[[User:Harry Dresden\|Harry Dresden]] ([[User talk:Harry Dresden\|talk]]) 16:20, 2 January 2015 (PST)		I like just images with no prices. Clean and easy to find a specific one if you're looking for it. --[[User:Harry Dresden\|Harry Dresden]] ([[User talk:Harry Dresden\|talk]]) 16:20, 2 January 2015 (PST)
	::I like Transposed, no prices, but with the names below. [[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 16:22, 2 January 2015 (PST)		::I like Transposed, no prices, but with the names below. [[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 16:22, 2 January 2015 (PST)
			:: I like the most compact table, the one on the bottom of hoyifung04's sandbox page. [[User:Sanjuro\|Sanjuro]] ([[User talk:Sanjuro\|talk]]) 18:52, 2 January 2015 (PST)

Patojonas: Transposed, no prices please

2015-01-03T00:22:15Z

Transposed, no prices please

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:22, 3 January 2015
Line 307:		Line 307:
	::I like the "Transposed, no prices" from hoy's user page. --[[User:Trog\|‡ Trog ‡]] ([[User talk:Trog\|talk]]) 16:20, 2 January 2015 (PST)		::I like the "Transposed, no prices" from hoy's user page. --[[User:Trog\|‡ Trog ‡]] ([[User talk:Trog\|talk]]) 16:20, 2 January 2015 (PST)
	I like just images with no prices. Clean and easy to find a specific one if you're looking for it. --[[User:Harry Dresden\|Harry Dresden]] ([[User talk:Harry Dresden\|talk]]) 16:20, 2 January 2015 (PST)		I like just images with no prices. Clean and easy to find a specific one if you're looking for it. --[[User:Harry Dresden\|Harry Dresden]] ([[User talk:Harry Dresden\|talk]]) 16:20, 2 January 2015 (PST)
			::I like Transposed, no prices, but with the names below. [[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 16:22, 2 January 2015 (PST)

Trog at 00:20, 3 January 2015

2015-01-03T00:20:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:20, 3 January 2015
Line 305:		Line 305:
	:I've made some suggestions for a new table (and copied the current one, for comparison) [[User:hoyifung04/Sandbox\|here]]. Feel free to add new tables to that page, but let's keep the discussion here on this page so it's consolidated. --[[User:Hoyifung04\|hoyifung04]] ([[User talk:Hoyifung04\|talk]]) 13:43, 2 January 2015 (PST)		:I've made some suggestions for a new table (and copied the current one, for comparison) [[User:hoyifung04/Sandbox\|here]]. Feel free to add new tables to that page, but let's keep the discussion here on this page so it's consolidated. --[[User:Hoyifung04\|hoyifung04]] ([[User talk:Hoyifung04\|talk]]) 13:43, 2 January 2015 (PST)
	::There are a lot of great options on your user page hoyifung04. I like "Transposed, no prices, reverse chrono, no text, single-line" the best but I could see it being awkward for users that like having some text to go by. Overall I'll support any of the options that are transposed with no prices as it cuts down on the pricing clutter and keeps the table from getting odd should it become too wide in coming years. --[[User:Valmo\|Valmo]] ([[User talk:Valmo\|talk]]) 14:41, 2 January 2015 (PST)		::There are a lot of great options on your user page hoyifung04. I like "Transposed, no prices, reverse chrono, no text, single-line" the best but I could see it being awkward for users that like having some text to go by. Overall I'll support any of the options that are transposed with no prices as it cuts down on the pricing clutter and keeps the table from getting odd should it become too wide in coming years. --[[User:Valmo\|Valmo]] ([[User talk:Valmo\|talk]]) 14:41, 2 January 2015 (PST)
	::I like the "Transposed, no prices" from hoy's user page.		::I like the "Transposed, no prices" from hoy's user page. --[[User:Trog\|‡ Trog ‡]] ([[User talk:Trog\|talk]]) 16:20, 2 January 2015 (PST)
	I like just images with no prices. Clean and easy to find a specific one if you're looking for it. --[[User:Harry Dresden\|Harry Dresden]] ([[User talk:Harry Dresden\|talk]]) 16:20, 2 January 2015 (PST)		I like just images with no prices. Clean and easy to find a specific one if you're looking for it. --[[User:Harry Dresden\|Harry Dresden]] ([[User talk:Harry Dresden\|talk]]) 16:20, 2 January 2015 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:48, 3 January 2015
Line 314:		Line 314:
	::: I also think text should be left in. No text = not searchable. Value of searchability will only go up as the page size goes up. --[[User:XKiv\|XKiv]] ([[User talk:XKiv\|talk]]) 10:41, 3 January 2015 (PST)		::: I also think text should be left in. No text = not searchable. Value of searchability will only go up as the page size goes up. --[[User:XKiv\|XKiv]] ([[User talk:XKiv\|talk]]) 10:41, 3 January 2015 (PST)
	::::We could put a condensed chart on the main page, with a link to a subpage ("The Wok of Stars/Previous Offerings") that contains the full (searchable) chart. --[[User:Hoyifung04\|hoyifung04]] ([[User talk:Hoyifung04\|talk]]) 12:09, 3 January 2015 (PST)		::::We could put a condensed chart on the main page, with a link to a subpage ("The Wok of Stars/Previous Offerings") that contains the full (searchable) chart. --[[User:Hoyifung04\|hoyifung04]] ([[User talk:Hoyifung04\|talk]]) 12:09, 3 January 2015 (PST)
			::::That would complicate things more than no names me thinks :P [[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 12:48, 3 January 2015 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:09, 3 January 2015
Line 313:		Line 313:
	::- I don't like not having the names because it makes life harder for newbies whenever I point them at the wok page and mention an iotm. It takes some space but is more intuitive and seems to me to be the right amount of information. About the chronological order....don't really have a strong opinion about it but I like chronological best. [[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 03:21, 3 January 2015 (PST)		::- I don't like not having the names because it makes life harder for newbies whenever I point them at the wok page and mention an iotm. It takes some space but is more intuitive and seems to me to be the right amount of information. About the chronological order....don't really have a strong opinion about it but I like chronological best. [[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 03:21, 3 January 2015 (PST)
	::: I also think text should be left in. No text = not searchable. Value of searchability will only go up as the page size goes up. --[[User:XKiv\|XKiv]] ([[User talk:XKiv\|talk]]) 10:41, 3 January 2015 (PST)		::: I also think text should be left in. No text = not searchable. Value of searchability will only go up as the page size goes up. --[[User:XKiv\|XKiv]] ([[User talk:XKiv\|talk]]) 10:41, 3 January 2015 (PST)
			::::We could put a condensed chart on the main page, with a link to a subpage ("The Wok of Stars/Previous Offerings") that contains the full (searchable) chart. --[[User:Hoyifung04\|hoyifung04]] ([[User talk:Hoyifung04\|talk]]) 12:09, 3 January 2015 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:41, 3 January 2015
Line 312:		Line 312:
	:I think we can all agree that the '''transpose''' and '''no prices''' options are good, and that the ''no images'' image is bad, which leaves two main options to discuss: '''reverse chrono''' and '''no text'''; the latter also has a option for '''single-line'''. Opinions? --[[User:Hoyifung04\|hoyifung04]] ([[User talk:Hoyifung04\|talk]]) 21:40, 2 January 2015 (PST)		:I think we can all agree that the '''transpose''' and '''no prices''' options are good, and that the ''no images'' image is bad, which leaves two main options to discuss: '''reverse chrono''' and '''no text'''; the latter also has a option for '''single-line'''. Opinions? --[[User:Hoyifung04\|hoyifung04]] ([[User talk:Hoyifung04\|talk]]) 21:40, 2 January 2015 (PST)
	::- I don't like not having the names because it makes life harder for newbies whenever I point them at the wok page and mention an iotm. It takes some space but is more intuitive and seems to me to be the right amount of information. About the chronological order....don't really have a strong opinion about it but I like chronological best. [[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 03:21, 3 January 2015 (PST)		::- I don't like not having the names because it makes life harder for newbies whenever I point them at the wok page and mention an iotm. It takes some space but is more intuitive and seems to me to be the right amount of information. About the chronological order....don't really have a strong opinion about it but I like chronological best. [[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 03:21, 3 January 2015 (PST)
			::: I also think text should be left in. No text = not searchable. Value of searchability will only go up as the page size goes up. --[[User:XKiv\|XKiv]] ([[User talk:XKiv\|talk]]) 10:41, 3 January 2015 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:21, 3 January 2015
Line 311:		Line 311:
	:I think I like "Transposed, no prices, reverse chrono, no text" best. It's the most concise. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]] ([[User talk:Cristiona\|talk]]) 21:01, 2 January 2015 (PST)		:I think I like "Transposed, no prices, reverse chrono, no text" best. It's the most concise. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]] ([[User talk:Cristiona\|talk]]) 21:01, 2 January 2015 (PST)
	:I think we can all agree that the '''transpose''' and '''no prices''' options are good, and that the ''no images'' image is bad, which leaves two main options to discuss: '''reverse chrono''' and '''no text'''; the latter also has a option for '''single-line'''. Opinions? --[[User:Hoyifung04\|hoyifung04]] ([[User talk:Hoyifung04\|talk]]) 21:40, 2 January 2015 (PST)		:I think we can all agree that the '''transpose''' and '''no prices''' options are good, and that the ''no images'' image is bad, which leaves two main options to discuss: '''reverse chrono''' and '''no text'''; the latter also has a option for '''single-line'''. Opinions? --[[User:Hoyifung04\|hoyifung04]] ([[User talk:Hoyifung04\|talk]]) 21:40, 2 January 2015 (PST)
			::- I don't like not having the names because it makes life harder for newbies whenever I point them at the wok page and mention an iotm. It takes some space but is more intuitive and seems to me to be the right amount of information. About the chronological order....don't really have a strong opinion about it but I like chronological best. [[User:Patojonas\|Patojonas]] 03:21, 3 January 2015 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:43, 3 January 2015
Line 310:		Line 310:
	:: I like the most compact table, the one on the bottom of hoyifung04's sandbox page. [[User:Sanjuro\|Sanjuro]] ([[User talk:Sanjuro\|talk]]) 18:52, 2 January 2015 (PST)		:: I like the most compact table, the one on the bottom of hoyifung04's sandbox page. [[User:Sanjuro\|Sanjuro]] ([[User talk:Sanjuro\|talk]]) 18:52, 2 January 2015 (PST)
	:I think I like "Transposed, no prices, reverse chrono, no text" best. It's the most concise. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]] ([[User talk:Cristiona\|talk]]) 21:01, 2 January 2015 (PST)		:I think I like "Transposed, no prices, reverse chrono, no text" best. It's the most concise. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]] ([[User talk:Cristiona\|talk]]) 21:01, 2 January 2015 (PST)
	:I think we can all agree that the '''transpose''' and '''no prices''' options are good, and that the ''no images'' image is bad, which leaves two options to discuss: '''reverse chrono''' and '''single-line'''. Opinions? --[[User:Hoyifung04\|hoyifung04]] ([[User talk:Hoyifung04\|talk]]) 21:40, 2 January 2015 (PST)		:I think we can all agree that the '''transpose''' and '''no prices''' options are good, and that the ''no images'' image is bad, which leaves two main options to discuss: '''reverse chrono''' and '''no text'''; the latter also has a option for '''single-line'''. Opinions? --[[User:Hoyifung04\|hoyifung04]] ([[User talk:Hoyifung04\|talk]]) 21:40, 2 January 2015 (PST)