Template talk:Item - Revision history

Cristiona: /* Weapon Conflict */

2013-02-13T10:45:09Z

Weapon Conflict

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:45, 13 February 2013
Line 65:		Line 65:
	Something here is conflicting with weapon-types. Take a look at, for example, [[The golem's Glock]]. The bolding isn't right and there's extra apostrophes. Pretty much every weapon page has this issue, but I have no idea how to fix it. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]] ([[User talk:Cristiona\|talk]]) 23:06, 12 February 2013 (PST)		Something here is conflicting with weapon-types. Take a look at, for example, [[The golem's Glock]]. The bolding isn't right and there's extra apostrophes. Pretty much every weapon page has this issue, but I have no idea how to fix it. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]] ([[User talk:Cristiona\|talk]]) 23:06, 12 February 2013 (PST)
	:I'm pretty sure that the most recent wiki move a few months ago was when this started. The new wiki format doesn't like having nothing between apostrophes for bolded and/or italicised font, especially since it then detects later apostrophes as the closing pair. I think I've fixed this problem now. --[[User:Hoyifung04\|hoyifung04]] ([[User talk:Hoyifung04\|talk]]) 23:36, 12 February 2013 (PST)		:I'm pretty sure that the most recent wiki move a few months ago was when this started. The new wiki format doesn't like having nothing between apostrophes for bolded and/or italicised font, especially since it then detects later apostrophes as the closing pair. I think I've fixed this problem now. --[[User:Hoyifung04\|hoyifung04]] ([[User talk:Hoyifung04\|talk]]) 23:36, 12 February 2013 (PST)
			::It looks like it was fixed, thanks. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]] ([[User talk:Cristiona\|talk]]) 02:45, 13 February 2013 (PST)

Hoyifung04: /* Weapon Conflict */

2013-02-13T07:36:28Z

Weapon Conflict

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:36, 13 February 2013
Line 64:		Line 64:

	Something here is conflicting with weapon-types. Take a look at, for example, [[The golem's Glock]]. The bolding isn't right and there's extra apostrophes. Pretty much every weapon page has this issue, but I have no idea how to fix it. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]] ([[User talk:Cristiona\|talk]]) 23:06, 12 February 2013 (PST)		Something here is conflicting with weapon-types. Take a look at, for example, [[The golem's Glock]]. The bolding isn't right and there's extra apostrophes. Pretty much every weapon page has this issue, but I have no idea how to fix it. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]] ([[User talk:Cristiona\|talk]]) 23:06, 12 February 2013 (PST)
			:I'm pretty sure that the most recent wiki move a few months ago was when this started. The new wiki format doesn't like having nothing between apostrophes for bolded and/or italicised font, especially since it then detects later apostrophes as the closing pair. I think I've fixed this problem now. --[[User:Hoyifung04\|hoyifung04]] ([[User talk:Hoyifung04\|talk]]) 23:36, 12 February 2013 (PST)

Cristiona at 07:06, 13 February 2013

2013-02-13T07:06:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:06, 13 February 2013
Line 60:		Line 60:
	This didn't matter until today, as no vehicles had a level requirement. Now that the [[Dreamer's clock]] is level 15, the template display is different from the popup. Namely, on the popup, range comes before level as opposed to the other way around. I don't know if it's a big deal, but I thought I'd point it out. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]]		This didn't matter until today, as no vehicles had a level requirement. Now that the [[Dreamer's clock]] is level 15, the template display is different from the popup. Namely, on the popup, range comes before level as opposed to the other way around. I don't know if it's a big deal, but I thought I'd point it out. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]]
	: Fixed. --[[User:PKProStudio\|PKProStudio]] 13:52, 11 October 2009 (UTC)		: Fixed. --[[User:PKProStudio\|PKProStudio]] 13:52, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

			== Weapon Conflict ==

			Something here is conflicting with weapon-types. Take a look at, for example, [[The golem's Glock]]. The bolding isn't right and there's extra apostrophes. Pretty much every weapon page has this issue, but I have no idea how to fix it. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]] ([[User talk:Cristiona\|talk]]) 23:06, 12 February 2013 (PST)

Muhandes: /* Redirects */

2009-12-01T18:34:45Z

Redirects

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:34, 1 December 2009
Line 20:		Line 20:

	== Redirects ==		== Redirects ==
	Would it be possible to add some kind of "Go back to [[Items by Name]]" to the template automatically (preferably at the top or something)? [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]] 23:25, 25 January 2008 (MST)		Would it be possible to add some kind of "Go back to Items by Name" to the template automatically (preferably at the top or something)? [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]] 23:25, 25 January 2008 (MST)

	Done. - Satan		Done. - Satan

PKProStudio at 13:52, 11 October 2009

2009-10-11T13:52:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:52, 11 October 2009
Line 59:		Line 59:

	This didn't matter until today, as no vehicles had a level requirement. Now that the [[Dreamer's clock]] is level 15, the template display is different from the popup. Namely, on the popup, range comes before level as opposed to the other way around. I don't know if it's a big deal, but I thought I'd point it out. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]]		This didn't matter until today, as no vehicles had a level requirement. Now that the [[Dreamer's clock]] is level 15, the template display is different from the popup. Namely, on the popup, range comes before level as opposed to the other way around. I don't know if it's a big deal, but I thought I'd point it out. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]]
			: Fixed. --[[User:PKProStudio\|PKProStudio]] 13:52, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Cristiona at 03:07, 11 October 2009

2009-10-11T03:07:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:07, 11 October 2009
Line 55:		Line 55:
	What do you think of autocating effects? That is, a way to add each of the effects, which automatically categotized the item, instead of the "See Also", which I don't like and is often forgotten. For example, say an item adds +3 Intellect. You write \|modintellect=3, and it adds the correct text and categorized it under [[:Category:Intellect Modifiers]]. Alternatively the same effect can be achieved with a template. This would looks something like <nowiki>\|ench={{modifier\|intellect\|3}}</nowiki>.--[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 23:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC)		What do you think of autocating effects? That is, a way to add each of the effects, which automatically categotized the item, instead of the "See Also", which I don't like and is often forgotten. For example, say an item adds +3 Intellect. You write \|modintellect=3, and it adds the correct text and categorized it under [[:Category:Intellect Modifiers]]. Alternatively the same effect can be achieved with a template. This would looks something like <nowiki>\|ench={{modifier\|intellect\|3}}</nowiki>.--[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 23:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
	: Bump, any comments on this before I start implementing it? I think I like the <nowiki>{{modifier}}</nowiki> template better--[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 23:30, 26 January 2009 (UTC)		: Bump, any comments on this before I start implementing it? I think I like the <nowiki>{{modifier}}</nowiki> template better--[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 23:30, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

			== Range vs Level ==

			This didn't matter until today, as no vehicles had a level requirement. Now that the [[Dreamer's clock]] is level 15, the template display is different from the popup. Namely, on the popup, range comes before level as opposed to the other way around. I don't know if it's a big deal, but I thought I'd point it out. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]]

Muhandes: /* autocating */

2009-01-26T23:30:47Z

autocating

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:30, 26 January 2009
Line 53:		Line 53:
	== autocating ==		== autocating ==

	What do you think of autocating effects? That is, a way to add each of the effects, which automatically categotized the item, instead of the "See Also", which I don't like and is often forgotten. For example, say an item adds +3 Intellect. You write \|modintellect=3, and it adds the correct text and categorized it under [[:Category:Intellect Modifiers]]. Alternatively the same effect can be achieved with a template. This would looks something like \|ench={{modifier\|intellect\|3}}.--[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 23:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC)		What do you think of autocating effects? That is, a way to add each of the effects, which automatically categotized the item, instead of the "See Also", which I don't like and is often forgotten. For example, say an item adds +3 Intellect. You write \|modintellect=3, and it adds the correct text and categorized it under [[:Category:Intellect Modifiers]]. Alternatively the same effect can be achieved with a template. This would looks something like <nowiki>\|ench={{modifier\|intellect\|3}}</nowiki>.--[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 23:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
			: Bump, any comments on this before I start implementing it? I think I like the <nowiki>{{modifier}}</nowiki> template better--[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 23:30, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Muhandes: /* autocating */ new section

2009-01-17T23:50:56Z

autocating: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:50, 17 January 2009
Line 50:		Line 50:
	== Caffeine/Sugar ==		== Caffeine/Sugar ==
	Anyone have an opinion about adding the caffeination and sugar levels to the template? Personally I don't feel like we need to add them, they seem just fine in the notes, but I'm open to other opinions.--[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 14:52, 12 January 2009 (UTC)		Anyone have an opinion about adding the caffeination and sugar levels to the template? Personally I don't feel like we need to add them, they seem just fine in the notes, but I'm open to other opinions.--[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 14:52, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

			== autocating ==

			What do you think of autocating effects? That is, a way to add each of the effects, which automatically categotized the item, instead of the "See Also", which I don't like and is often forgotten. For example, say an item adds +3 Intellect. You write \|modintellect=3, and it adds the correct text and categorized it under [[:Category:Intellect Modifiers]]. Alternatively the same effect can be achieved with a template. This would looks something like \|ench={{modifier\|intellect\|3}}.--[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 23:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Muhandes at 14:52, 12 January 2009

2009-01-12T14:52:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:52, 12 January 2009
Line 48:		Line 48:

	That could work. I'd just like to have it because...they're references. --[[User:MagiNinjA\|<font color=#701337><b>MN (#228)</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:MagiNinjA\|T]]\|[[Special:Contributions/MagiNinjA\|C]])</small> 13:05, 1 December 2008 (MST)		That could work. I'd just like to have it because...they're references. --[[User:MagiNinjA\|<font color=#701337><b>MN (#228)</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:MagiNinjA\|T]]\|[[Special:Contributions/MagiNinjA\|C]])</small> 13:05, 1 December 2008 (MST)
			== Caffeine/Sugar ==
			Anyone have an opinion about adding the caffeination and sugar levels to the template? Personally I don't feel like we need to add them, they seem just fine in the notes, but I'm open to other opinions.--[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 14:52, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

MagiNinjA: /* References */

2008-12-01T20:05:07Z

References

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:05, 1 December 2008
Line 46:		Line 46:

	If we do "References", might as well do "Notes". But aren't we over-templatizing? I think standardization is the goal and templatization is one way to get there. I'm not sure we have a standardization issue with references and notes, such as we had with other things, so I'm not sure this is needed. Just my thoughts--[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 02:24, 1 December 2008 (MST)		If we do "References", might as well do "Notes". But aren't we over-templatizing? I think standardization is the goal and templatization is one way to get there. I'm not sure we have a standardization issue with references and notes, such as we had with other things, so I'm not sure this is needed. Just my thoughts--[[User:Muhandes\|Muhandes]] 02:24, 1 December 2008 (MST)

			That could work. I'd just like to have it because...they're references. --[[User:MagiNinjA\|<font color=#701337><b>MN (#228)</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:MagiNinjA\|T]]\|[[Special:Contributions/MagiNinjA\|C]])</small> 13:05, 1 December 2008 (MST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:45, 13 February 2013
Line 65:		Line 65:
	Something here is conflicting with weapon-types. Take a look at, for example, [[The golem's Glock]]. The bolding isn't right and there's extra apostrophes. Pretty much every weapon page has this issue, but I have no idea how to fix it. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]] ([[User talk:Cristiona\|talk]]) 23:06, 12 February 2013 (PST)		Something here is conflicting with weapon-types. Take a look at, for example, [[The golem's Glock]]. The bolding isn't right and there's extra apostrophes. Pretty much every weapon page has this issue, but I have no idea how to fix it. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]] ([[User talk:Cristiona\|talk]]) 23:06, 12 February 2013 (PST)
	:I'm pretty sure that the most recent wiki move a few months ago was when this started. The new wiki format doesn't like having nothing between apostrophes for bolded and/or italicised font, especially since it then detects later apostrophes as the closing pair. I think I've fixed this problem now. --[[User:Hoyifung04\|hoyifung04]] ([[User talk:Hoyifung04\|talk]]) 23:36, 12 February 2013 (PST)		:I'm pretty sure that the most recent wiki move a few months ago was when this started. The new wiki format doesn't like having nothing between apostrophes for bolded and/or italicised font, especially since it then detects later apostrophes as the closing pair. I think I've fixed this problem now. --[[User:Hoyifung04\|hoyifung04]] ([[User talk:Hoyifung04\|talk]]) 23:36, 12 February 2013 (PST)
			::It looks like it was fixed, thanks. [[User:Cristiona\|Cristiona]] ([[User talk:Cristiona\|talk]]) 02:45, 13 February 2013 (PST)