Talk:Dangerously Dour: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Toolverine (talk | contribs) Cooler Crits! |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
No, this is a +Damage pill...I went from doing 30-70 damage to doing 70-140! | No, this is a +Damage pill...I went from doing 30-70 damage to doing 70-140! | ||
No change in equipment! Every hit was a home run swing! And that's even WITHOUT Crits! | No change in equipment! Every hit was a home run swing! And that's even WITHOUT Crits! | ||
Wow, my Crits are 240-300! It ends the fight in one Crit! | Wow, my Crits are 240-300! It ends the fight in one Crit! {{unsigned|Toolverine}} | ||
looking at toolverine's single data point and his current level (39, though probably less when he posted that) | |||
it's probably 1:1, so optimally useful at around level what, 15? {{unsigned|The supernaturalist|05:30, 5 April 2009}} | |||
: How did you get that level 15 number? Are you saying there is a cap? I think we need many more data points. Oh, and please sign your messages --[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] 06:18, 5 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 06:18, 5 April 2009
Sounds like +noncombat. Would make sense in contrary to the lion pill. --MN (#228) (T|C) 05:05, 25 November 2008 (MST)
No, this is a +Damage pill...I went from doing 30-70 damage to doing 70-140! No change in equipment! Every hit was a home run swing! And that's even WITHOUT Crits! Wow, my Crits are 240-300! It ends the fight in one Crit! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Toolverine (talk • contribs).
looking at toolverine's single data point and his current level (39, though probably less when he posted that) it's probably 1:1, so optimally useful at around level what, 15? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by The supernaturalist (talk • contribs) 05:30, 5 April 2009.
- How did you get that level 15 number? Are you saying there is a cap? I think we need many more data points. Oh, and please sign your messages --Muhandes 06:18, 5 April 2009 (UTC)