Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bonus spell damage"
(14 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Which skills are 'spells'? --[[User:Lxndr|Lxndr]] 10:21, 1 January 2011 (PST) | Which skills are 'spells'? --[[User:Lxndr|Lxndr]] 10:21, 1 January 2011 (PST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Psion and Elemental attack skills --[[User:Shikao|Shikao]] 12:07, 1 January 2011 (PST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Formula== | ||
+ | I wondered how +X and +Y% works combined, so I did some testing. Checked only on one spell (Firestorm), but I assume formula is common for all spells: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Total damage of spell = round(1.Y*damage of spell)+X | ||
+ | *Y is sum of +% spell damage | ||
+ | *X is sum of + spell damage | ||
+ | |||
+ | I think it's worth putting on page, but I will leave wording for someone better at it =P --[[User:Shikao|Shikao]] 08:24, 2 January 2011 (PST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | : Added. --[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] 05:49, 4 January 2011 (PST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Caps and bonus== | ||
+ | Page states: | ||
+ | *Note that damage caps apply. That is, if a spell has a damage cap, spell damage modifiers cannot give more damage than the cap. | ||
+ | I haven't check spells and bonuses particularly for this, but I don't think it's true. I will investigate it on nearest occasion, but in meantime could some tell me what is source of this statement?--[[User:Shikao|Shikao]] 08:54, 4 January 2011 (PST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | : The source is a discussion with Ryme on chat. I must admit I never checked it. Do you have contradictory data? --[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] 01:45, 5 January 2011 (PST) | ||
+ | :: Right now I can say that +%spell damage can definitely raise damage over caps. But as I said, I will check it more thoroughly. When did this discussion happen? Before or after introduction of skill points? --[[User:Shikao|Shikao]] 02:14, 5 January 2011 (PST) | ||
+ | :Ok... let's try to present my findings... (SD = spell damage) | ||
+ | #formula I presented in section above is true for Firestorm (I guess it will work for Psionic Blast too, but it's unchecked for now) | ||
+ | #+X SD cannot raise damage above hard caps (Throw Sparks, Telekinesis), but +Y% SD can. | ||
+ | #for spells with soft caps: as much as possible +X SD goes under cap and that part is affected by +Y% SD, any leftover from +X SD falls into spells' over-cap formula.(checked for Ice Bolt, will test other spells tomorrow)<br> | ||
+ | :example: Ice Bolt with 10 skill points so cap is 60, anything over cap is square rooted. I have bonuses +10SD and +20%SD. I rolled 54 for base damage, total damage would be: (54+6)*1.2+sqrt(4)=74 --[[User:Shikao|Shikao]] 07:45, 5 January 2011 (PST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :: This disagrees with what you wrote above. You said percentile bonus is applied first, now you are saying the non-percentile bonus is applied first. Which one is it? --[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] 08:50, 5 January 2011 (PST) | ||
+ | ::: That depends whether there is 'place' for non-% bonus before cap or not. If lvl and intellect bonus are enough to fill the cap, then all non-% would be applied after % bonus, like in formula above. If not, then part or whole non-% bonus is applied first, as long as it doesn't reach cap, like in example in 3.--[[User:Shikao|Shikao]] 10:42, 6 January 2011 (PST) | ||
+ | ::::Let me see if I got it right. The order of bonuses is as follows: | ||
+ | ::::* Apply non-% bonuses, but only to the cap. | ||
+ | ::::* Apply % bonuses | ||
+ | ::::* In case of soft cap, apply remaining non-% bonuses | ||
+ | :::: Did I get it right? --[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] 09:04, 8 January 2011 (PST) | ||
+ | ::::: Yeah and presented it much simpler =P What I find strange is that not-capped spells (Firestorm and Psionic Blast) have non-% bonus applied after % bonus. --[[User:Shikao|Shikao]] 11:09, 8 January 2011 (PST) | ||
+ | :::::: That's indeed really odd, and I think you should ask Ryme about it (since you were the one who collected the data). --[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] 17:27, 8 January 2011 (PST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Response from Ryme:<br> | ||
+ | ''As in any other mathematical system, you always multiply and then add. Proper order of operations.'' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''The thing you guys are probably missing is that the cap expands with +% damage. I know I'm on record as saying this, but it may have been lost in the mists of time.'' | ||
+ | |||
+ | It really was piece of information I was missing. Taking into account that formula works for all spells. It definitely should be mention on page, it makes % bonus even more useful.--[[User:Shikao|Shikao]] 08:39, 12 January 2011 (PST) |
Latest revision as of 08:39, 12 January 2011
Enerbun sphere. +20, level 12 offhand. --MN (#228) (T|C) 18:32, 13 April 2008 (MST)
Isinglass orb. +6, level 4 offhand. --Usi 02:05, 3 May 2008 (MST)
Which skills are 'spells'? --Lxndr 10:21, 1 January 2011 (PST)
Psion and Elemental attack skills --Shikao 12:07, 1 January 2011 (PST)
Formula
I wondered how +X and +Y% works combined, so I did some testing. Checked only on one spell (Firestorm), but I assume formula is common for all spells:
Total damage of spell = round(1.Y*damage of spell)+X
- Y is sum of +% spell damage
- X is sum of + spell damage
I think it's worth putting on page, but I will leave wording for someone better at it =P --Shikao 08:24, 2 January 2011 (PST)
- Added. --Muhandes 05:49, 4 January 2011 (PST)
Caps and bonus
Page states:
- Note that damage caps apply. That is, if a spell has a damage cap, spell damage modifiers cannot give more damage than the cap.
I haven't check spells and bonuses particularly for this, but I don't think it's true. I will investigate it on nearest occasion, but in meantime could some tell me what is source of this statement?--Shikao 08:54, 4 January 2011 (PST)
- The source is a discussion with Ryme on chat. I must admit I never checked it. Do you have contradictory data? --Muhandes 01:45, 5 January 2011 (PST)
- Right now I can say that +%spell damage can definitely raise damage over caps. But as I said, I will check it more thoroughly. When did this discussion happen? Before or after introduction of skill points? --Shikao 02:14, 5 January 2011 (PST)
- Ok... let's try to present my findings... (SD = spell damage)
- formula I presented in section above is true for Firestorm (I guess it will work for Psionic Blast too, but it's unchecked for now)
- +X SD cannot raise damage above hard caps (Throw Sparks, Telekinesis), but +Y% SD can.
- for spells with soft caps: as much as possible +X SD goes under cap and that part is affected by +Y% SD, any leftover from +X SD falls into spells' over-cap formula.(checked for Ice Bolt, will test other spells tomorrow)
- example: Ice Bolt with 10 skill points so cap is 60, anything over cap is square rooted. I have bonuses +10SD and +20%SD. I rolled 54 for base damage, total damage would be: (54+6)*1.2+sqrt(4)=74 --Shikao 07:45, 5 January 2011 (PST)
- This disagrees with what you wrote above. You said percentile bonus is applied first, now you are saying the non-percentile bonus is applied first. Which one is it? --Muhandes 08:50, 5 January 2011 (PST)
- That depends whether there is 'place' for non-% bonus before cap or not. If lvl and intellect bonus are enough to fill the cap, then all non-% would be applied after % bonus, like in formula above. If not, then part or whole non-% bonus is applied first, as long as it doesn't reach cap, like in example in 3.--Shikao 10:42, 6 January 2011 (PST)
- Let me see if I got it right. The order of bonuses is as follows:
- Apply non-% bonuses, but only to the cap.
- Apply % bonuses
- In case of soft cap, apply remaining non-% bonuses
- Did I get it right? --Muhandes 09:04, 8 January 2011 (PST)
- Yeah and presented it much simpler =P What I find strange is that not-capped spells (Firestorm and Psionic Blast) have non-% bonus applied after % bonus. --Shikao 11:09, 8 January 2011 (PST)
- That's indeed really odd, and I think you should ask Ryme about it (since you were the one who collected the data). --Muhandes 17:27, 8 January 2011 (PST)
- Yeah and presented it much simpler =P What I find strange is that not-capped spells (Firestorm and Psionic Blast) have non-% bonus applied after % bonus. --Shikao 11:09, 8 January 2011 (PST)
- Let me see if I got it right. The order of bonuses is as follows:
- That depends whether there is 'place' for non-% bonus before cap or not. If lvl and intellect bonus are enough to fill the cap, then all non-% would be applied after % bonus, like in formula above. If not, then part or whole non-% bonus is applied first, as long as it doesn't reach cap, like in example in 3.--Shikao 10:42, 6 January 2011 (PST)
- This disagrees with what you wrote above. You said percentile bonus is applied first, now you are saying the non-percentile bonus is applied first. Which one is it? --Muhandes 08:50, 5 January 2011 (PST)
Response from Ryme:
As in any other mathematical system, you always multiply and then add. Proper order of operations.
The thing you guys are probably missing is that the cap expands with +% damage. I know I'm on record as saying this, but it may have been lost in the mists of time.
It really was piece of information I was missing. Taking into account that formula works for all spells. It definitely should be mention on page, it makes % bonus even more useful.--Shikao 08:39, 12 January 2011 (PST)