Category talk:Locations: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
PKProStudio (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Many of these cannot be patrolled in. We probably want to put them in a separate category. Ideas? --[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] 18:42, 29 August 2009 (UTC) | Many of these cannot be patrolled in. We probably want to put them in a separate category. Ideas? --[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] 18:42, 29 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I think it's better to make one or two new categories - patrol-ables and non-patrol-ables (names could be better, I know. ^^). Locations as a catch all is fine by me. --[[User:Alarion|Alarion]] 18:57, 29 August 2009 (UTC) | :I think it's better to make one or two new categories - patrol-ables and non-patrol-ables (names could be better, I know. ^^). Locations as a catch all is fine by me. --[[User:Alarion|Alarion]] 18:57, 29 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Well the description says that they are locations you can PATROL in, so we should change the description, or separate them. --[[User:PKProStudio|PKProStudio]] 19:00, 29 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:00, 29 August 2009
Many of these cannot be patrolled in. We probably want to put them in a separate category. Ideas? --Muhandes 18:42, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
- I think it's better to make one or two new categories - patrol-ables and non-patrol-ables (names could be better, I know. ^^). Locations as a catch all is fine by me. --Alarion 18:57, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
- Well the description says that they are locations you can PATROL in, so we should change the description, or separate them. --PKProStudio 19:00, 29 August 2009 (UTC)