Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bonus spell damage"
(Caps and bonus) |
(→Caps and bonus) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
*Note that damage caps apply. That is, if a spell has a damage cap, spell damage modifiers cannot give more damage than the cap. | *Note that damage caps apply. That is, if a spell has a damage cap, spell damage modifiers cannot give more damage than the cap. | ||
I haven't check spells and bonuses particularly for this, but I don't think it's true. I will investigate it on nearest occasion, but in meantime could some tell me what is source of this statement?--[[User:Shikao|Shikao]] 08:54, 4 January 2011 (PST) | I haven't check spells and bonuses particularly for this, but I don't think it's true. I will investigate it on nearest occasion, but in meantime could some tell me what is source of this statement?--[[User:Shikao|Shikao]] 08:54, 4 January 2011 (PST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | : The source is a discussion with Ryme on chat. I must admit I never checked it. Do you have contradictory data? --[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] 01:45, 5 January 2011 (PST) |
Revision as of 01:45, 5 January 2011
Enerbun sphere. +20, level 12 offhand. --MN (#228) (T|C) 18:32, 13 April 2008 (MST)
Isinglass orb. +6, level 4 offhand. --Usi 02:05, 3 May 2008 (MST)
Which skills are 'spells'? --Lxndr 10:21, 1 January 2011 (PST)
Psion and Elemental attack skills --Shikao 12:07, 1 January 2011 (PST)
Formula
I wondered how +X and +Y% works combined, so I did some testing. Checked only on one spell (Firestorm), but I assume formula is common for all spells:
Total damage of spell = round(1.Y*damage of spell)+X
- Y is sum of +% spell damage
- X is sum of + spell damage
I think it's worth putting on page, but I will leave wording for someone better at it =P --Shikao 08:24, 2 January 2011 (PST)
- Added. --Muhandes 05:49, 4 January 2011 (PST)
Caps and bonus
Page states:
- Note that damage caps apply. That is, if a spell has a damage cap, spell damage modifiers cannot give more damage than the cap.
I haven't check spells and bonuses particularly for this, but I don't think it's true. I will investigate it on nearest occasion, but in meantime could some tell me what is source of this statement?--Shikao 08:54, 4 January 2011 (PST)
- The source is a discussion with Ryme on chat. I must admit I never checked it. Do you have contradictory data? --Muhandes 01:45, 5 January 2011 (PST)