Talk:Level Mechanics
New formula 26-50
Level | Total XP Required | XP to gain | Chips Required |
26 | 368,000 | +32,000 | 2,500 |
27 | 401,000 | +33,000 | 2,600 |
28 | 435,000 | +34,000 | 2,700 |
29 | 470,000 | +35,000 | 2,800 |
30 | 506,000 | +36,000 | 2,900 |
31 | 543,000 | +37,000 | 3,000 |
32 | 581,000 | +38,000 | 3,100 |
33 | 620,000 | +39,000 | 3,200 |
34 | 660,000 | +40,000 | 3,300 |
35 | 701,000 | +41,000 | 3,400 |
36 | 743,000 | +42,000 | 3,500 |
37 | 786,000 | +43,000 | 3,600 |
38 | 830,000 | +44,000 | 3,700 |
39 | 875,000 | +45,000 | 3,800 |
40 | 931,000 | +46,000 | 3,900 |
41 | 978,000 | +47,000 | 4,000 |
42 | 1,016,000 | +48,000 | 4,100 |
43 | 1,065,000 | +49,000 | 4,200 |
44 | 1,115,000 | +50,000 | 4,300 |
45 | 1,166,000 | +51,000 | 4,400 |
46 | 1,218,000 | +52,000 | 4,500 |
47 | 1,271,000 | +53,000 | 4,600 |
48 | 1,325,000 | +54,000 | 4,700 |
49 | 1,380,000 | +55,000 | 4,800 |
50 | 1,436,000 | +56,000 | 4,900 |
Level 42 needs 1,016,000xp
Level 43 needs 1,065,000xp
Level 44 needs 1,115,000xp
Level 45 needs 1,166,000xp
Level 46 needs 1,218,000xp, 4500 chips
Level 47 needs 1,271,000xp, 4600 chips
Level 48 needs 1,325,000xp, 4700 chips
Level 49 needs 1,380,000xp, 4800 chips
Level 50 needs 1,436,000xp, 4900 chips
--Harry Dresden 07:53, 10 January 2011 (PST)
Could you also note down chip cost? For now it looks that experience needed to lvl up is (lvl+7)*1000exp --Shikao 06:41, 13 January 2011 (PST)
- Chip cost is still the same as before - level*100--Harry Dresden 06:34, 15 January 2011 (PST)
Graphing these results, here's the pattern I've found:
- To go from 42 to 43 is 49k
- To go from 43 to 44 is 50k
- To go from 44 to 45 is 51k
- To go from 45 to 46 is 52k
...and so on If this pattern holds, Harry will need 1,436,000 to reach level 50. (56k from 1,380,000) Unfortunately, assuming I'm right, we still need the data from levels 25 to 41 to figure out the equation completely.--Lxndr 13:49, 20 January 2011 (PST)
- That said, if we extrapolate this pattern back to 25, we wind up with 336,000 at level 25 (an exact match with the data we have), which implies that, after level 25, it's (current level+7)*1000 to reach the next level. Of course, things probably change above 50, in the Aquasson base. --Lxndr 14:09, 20 January 2011 (PST)
- In few days I will start collecting data from 25 =]--Shikao 21:27, 20 January 2011 (PST)
- That equation seems correct. Feel free to add the data, it can be verified later. --Muhandes 23:36, 20 January 2011 (PST)
Basing on Cristiona's old formula for 50+ I came up with this for 26-50 total experience:
(level-25)*32,000+500*((level-26)^2+level-26)+33,6000
--Shikao 01:30, 30 January 2011 (PST)
Formula 51+
Level | Total XP Required | XP to gain | Logos Required |
51 | 1,495,000 | +59,000 | 20 |
52 | 1,560,000 | +65,000 | 20 |
53 | 1,631,500 | +71,500 | 20 |
54 | 1,710,000 | +78,500 | 21 |
55 | 1,796,000 | +86,000 | 21 |
56 | 1,890,000 | +94,000 | 21 |
57 (predicted) | 1,992,500 | +102,500 |
Level 51 needs 1,495,000xp, 20 logos
Level 52 needs 1,560,000xp, 20 logos
Level 53 needs 1,631,500xp, 20 logos
Level 54 needs 1,710,000xp, 21 logos
Level 55 needs 1,796,000xp, 21 logos
Level 56 needs 1,890,000xp, 21 logos
Level 57 needs 1,992,500xp, 21 logos
Level 58 needs 2,104,000xp
--Harry Dresden 07:53, 10 January 2011 (PST)
Hope you don't mind moving your data Harry --Shikao 23:39, 25 January 2011 (PST)
So far we have:
+59,000, +65,000, +71,000, +79,000, +86000. That's a difference of 6000, 6000, 8000, and 7000. I'm not finding any good equation to fit these 4 data points, which is odd, as that's usually enough to find most equations.
--Lxndr 15:31, 28 January 2011 (PST)
Not that it helps the formula, but the table misses that level 53 needs 500 on the end instead of 000. --Harry Dresden 20:19, 28 January 2011 (PST)
- Thanks! It helps a lot, now we have 6k, 6.5k, 7k and 7.5k differences which is way more reasonable =] --Shikao 02:01, 29 January 2011 (PST)
- Yes, that helps immensely! With that divide, we can see level 56 would need 1890000, which is what you got. 57 will probably need 1,992,500. Let's see if I'm right... --Lxndr 09:22, 31 January 2011 (PST)