Difference between revisions of "Talk:A Funny Room"

From Twilight Heroes Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 12: Line 12:
 
:Lost 53 (50) --[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] 09:56, 5 October 2010 (PDT)
 
:Lost 53 (50) --[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] 09:56, 5 October 2010 (PDT)
 
:Won 73 (51) --[[User:Zillow|Zillow]]
 
:Won 73 (51) --[[User:Zillow|Zillow]]
 +
:Lost with 58 (50) --[[User:Prestige|Prestige]] 22:25, 18 October 2010 (PDT)
 +
:Lost with 59 (46) --[[User:Blackmatter615|blackmatter615]] 19 October 2010
 +
 +
That would be it then. 60 in required stat is minimum to win.--[[User:Shikao|Shikao]] 07:58, 19 October 2010 (PDT)
 +
 +
{{FunnyRoomSpade}}

Latest revision as of 06:58, 19 October 2010

That'll Leave a Mark Slick! It seems like the walk will never end, but it does. Oh, does it ever. You get about a third of the way across when both feet slide in opposite directions. You can't recover before falling face first onto the beam and then sliding off into the pool of oil. Now you know what a french fry feels like. You lose 82 HP. -Sole Legend

Ever So Agile! Slick! It seems like the walk will never end. It's insufferably hot, and the bubbling oil keeps flicking hot droplets onto you. You almost slip several times but you manage to stay upright and make it across. You must have better balance than you thought! You gain 5 reflexes. --Aoi 02:06, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Data points

  • Lost with 53 reflexes.--Muhandes 15:50, 30 September 2010 (PDT)
Won with 91 (69) reflexes. --Prestige 04:55, 3 October 2010 (PDT)
Won 71 (67) --Shikao 09:14, 4 October 2010 (PDT)
Won 61 (54) -- jpsteel 5 Oct 2010
Lost 53 (50) --Muhandes 09:56, 5 October 2010 (PDT)
Won 73 (51) --Zillow
Lost with 58 (50) --Prestige 22:25, 18 October 2010 (PDT)
Lost with 59 (46) --blackmatter615 19 October 2010

That would be it then. 60 in required stat is minimum to win.--Shikao 07:58, 19 October 2010 (PDT)

Spading of the Funny Rooms has completed, the result is:

Highest lost: 59

Lowest won: 60

There is no need for any more data, unless it contradicts these findings --Muhandes 13:58, 19 October 2010 (PDT)