Difference between revisions of "Talk:Top Sponsors Full"
From Twilight Heroes Wiki
Malk-a-mite (talk | contribs) m |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
In full agreement with you Cris, I'm honing my table skills for now, which may be apparent from the number of edits to this message alone ;) [[User:Skysurfer|Skysurfer]] | In full agreement with you Cris, I'm honing my table skills for now, which may be apparent from the number of edits to this message alone ;) [[User:Skysurfer|Skysurfer]] | ||
| − | + | I broke the table into sections by using nested tables. Could easily go 3 across, but it might be too wide for some browsers... [[User:Flyboy|Flyboy]] 19:49, 7 February 2008 (MST) | |
| − | + | <br><br/> | |
| − | + | ||
| + | [[User:Flyboy|Flyboy]] you beat me to it ;) was going to break it up into 3 myself but you may have a point... I use a 17" screen so have no idea how bad it would look on a smaller screen with lower res. [[User:Skysurfer|Skysurfer]] | ||
| + | <br><br/> | ||
| + | <p> | ||
| + | How about one long list but do it like the Items list, broken into groups of say 25 with hotlinks at the top to each section - [[User:Malk-a-mite|Malk]] | ||
Latest revision as of 14:17, 8 February 2008
#11 - #161 needs some serious cleanup work. A single long column seems excessive, but... Cristiona
In full agreement with you Cris, I'm honing my table skills for now, which may be apparent from the number of edits to this message alone ;) Skysurfer
I broke the table into sections by using nested tables. Could easily go 3 across, but it might be too wide for some browsers... Flyboy 19:49, 7 February 2008 (MST)
Flyboy you beat me to it ;) was going to break it up into 3 myself but you may have a point... I use a 17" screen so have no idea how bad it would look on a smaller screen with lower res. Skysurfer
How about one long list but do it like the Items list, broken into groups of say 25 with hotlinks at the top to each section - Malk
