Talk:Quantum-tufted squirrel: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Bienenstock (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
data analysis |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: I wasn't the one who wrote the 52 number to begin with, but I just verified it - 52 for me. --[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] 19:07, 4 February 2010 (UTC) | : I wasn't the one who wrote the 52 number to begin with, but I just verified it - 52 for me. --[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] 19:07, 4 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
Well that is weird. I must have something going on with equipment. I don't see it though... [[User:Bienenstock|Bienenstock]] 20:23, 4 February 2010 (UTC) | Well that is weird. I must have something going on with equipment. I don't see it though... [[User:Bienenstock|Bienenstock]] 20:23, 4 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
:I figured out what it was. I'm an idiot... [[User:Bienenstock|Bienenstock]] 20:45, 4 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
==Drops== | |||
Out of 629 squirrels, I got: | |||
<!-- | |||
quantum-tufted squirrel|frusion speck|1 {{statrate|629|271|+}} | |||
quantum-tufted squirrel|frusion speck|2 {{statrate|629|48|+}} | |||
--> | |||
*quantum-tufted squirrel|frusion filament|1 {{statrate|629|114|+}} | |||
*quantum-tufted squirrel|frusion tendril|1 {{statrate|629|62|+}} | |||
*specks(stolen from [[Talk:Surly_gambler|here]]): | |||
:{| cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" border="1" align="left" style="text-align:center" | |||
|- | |||
! !! No drops !! One drop !! Two drops | |||
|- | |||
| Observed || {{statrate|629|310|+}}% || {{statrate|629|271|+}}% || {{statrate|629|48|+}}% | |||
|- | |||
| Predicted (30%) | |||
| {{#expr: (1-0.30)*(1-0.30)*100}}% | |||
| {{#expr: 2*0.30*(1-0.30)*100}}% | |||
| {{#expr: 0.30*0.30*100}}% | |||
|}<br clear="all"> | |||
Look like a good fit. [[User:Patojonas|Patojonas]] 06:24, 14 April 2015 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:24, 14 April 2015
I've gotten 67 experience each time I've killed one, but it was changed to 52. Can anyone else check it out? Bienenstock 15:42, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- I wasn't the one who wrote the 52 number to begin with, but I just verified it - 52 for me. --Muhandes 19:07, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Well that is weird. I must have something going on with equipment. I don't see it though... Bienenstock 20:23, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- I figured out what it was. I'm an idiot... Bienenstock 20:45, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Drops
Out of 629 squirrels, I got:
- quantum-tufted squirrel|frusion filament|1 18.1 ± 3.1
- quantum-tufted squirrel|frusion tendril|1 9.9 ± 2.4
- specks(stolen from here):
No drops One drop Two drops Observed 49.3 ± 4% 43.1 ± 3.9% 7.6 ± 2.1% Predicted (30%) 49% 42% 9%
Look like a good fit. Patojonas 06:24, 14 April 2015 (PDT)