Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gorblag"
From Twilight Heroes Wiki
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: I didn't notice fire damage, but I might have missed it. If you see it again please note the hit message.--[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] 22:48, 22 March 2009 (UTC) | : I didn't notice fire damage, but I might have missed it. If you see it again please note the hit message.--[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] 22:48, 22 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
:"Infinite resist" is usually called "immune". Also, the [[Letter of pre-recognition]] only does 1 damage. [[User:Cristiona|Cristiona]] | :"Infinite resist" is usually called "immune". Also, the [[Letter of pre-recognition]] only does 1 damage. [[User:Cristiona|Cristiona]] | ||
| + | :: As I understand it, we used the term "resistant" to mean "100% resistant" or "immune", i.e. takes only 1 damage. I agree this is somewhat confusing. I waited a bit with standardizing resistances, as I wanted to see what kind of mechanisms to expect, but the time might be right. We can go with what Cris says, use the term "immune" to say something was tested to be 100% resistant, i.e. takes 1 damage only. The term "resistant" will mean that there is some yet undetermined amount of resistance, and "X% resistant" with some specific value of X will mean that the amount of resistance was spaded. Does this sound like a good idea? If this is cool, I might also templatize and auto-categorize resistances/weaknesses --[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] 07:39, 23 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:39, 22 March 2009
This creature also does fire damage... Hmmm. Also, it either has 90% resist fire, or infinite resist (with damage capped at 1). The only amount of damage I saw it with was the usual +10 from the pants, so a +1 from the flaming whip would mean it's infinite capped at one, a +2 would mean it's 90% resist. - Satan
- I didn't notice fire damage, but I might have missed it. If you see it again please note the hit message.--Muhandes 22:48, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
- "Infinite resist" is usually called "immune". Also, the Letter of pre-recognition only does 1 damage. Cristiona
- As I understand it, we used the term "resistant" to mean "100% resistant" or "immune", i.e. takes only 1 damage. I agree this is somewhat confusing. I waited a bit with standardizing resistances, as I wanted to see what kind of mechanisms to expect, but the time might be right. We can go with what Cris says, use the term "immune" to say something was tested to be 100% resistant, i.e. takes 1 damage only. The term "resistant" will mean that there is some yet undetermined amount of resistance, and "X% resistant" with some specific value of X will mean that the amount of resistance was spaded. Does this sound like a good idea? If this is cool, I might also templatize and auto-categorize resistances/weaknesses --Muhandes 07:39, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
