Difference between revisions of "Talk:Data mite"

From Twilight Heroes Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "S.M.A.R.T tells me the following: -Your defenses seem solid compared to your foe [sic]. -Your opponent has a fiercer attack than you do.My stats: Strength: 98 (80) Intellect: 46 ...")
 
(new data, new numbers)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
Yingxiong
 
Yingxiong
 +
 +
==Drop Rate Spadings ==
 +
 +
Drop data from a total of 875 encounters:
 +
* datamites (stolen from [[Talk:Surly_gambler|here]]):
 +
 +
:{| cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" border="1" align="left" style="text-align:center"
 +
|-
 +
! !! No drops !! One drop !! Two drops
 +
|-
 +
| Observed || {{statrate|875|649|+}}% || {{statrate|875|217|+}}% || {{statrate|875|9|+}}%
 +
|-
 +
| Predicted 15%/10%
 +
| {{#expr: (1-0.15)*(1-0.10)*100}}%
 +
| {{#expr: (0.15*(1-0.10) + 0.10*(1-0.15))*100}}%
 +
| {{#expr: 0.15*0.10*100}}%
 +
|}<br clear="all">
 +
 +
Looks like a good fit to me ;) [[User:Patojonas|Patojonas]] 11:07, 7 October 2012 (PDT)
 +
 +
 +
----
 +
Drop data from a total of 1032 encounters:
 +
 +
:{| cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" border="1" align="left" style="text-align:center"
 +
|-
 +
! !! No drops !! One drop !! Two drops
 +
|-
 +
| Observed || {{statrate|1032|730|+}}% || {{statrate|1032|287|+}}% || {{statrate|1032|15|+}}%
 +
|-
 +
| Predicted 20%/10%
 +
| {{#expr: (1-0.20)*(1-0.10)*100}}%
 +
| {{#expr: (0.20*(1-0.10) + 0.10*(1-0.20))*100}}%
 +
| {{#expr: 0.20*0.10*100}}%
 +
|}<br clear="all">
 +
 +
Looks like the previous data set wasn't good enough, 20/10 is a better fit now. [[User:Patojonas|Patojonas]]  10:18, 6 March 2015 (PST)

Latest revision as of 10:18, 6 March 2015

S.M.A.R.T tells me the following: -Your defenses seem solid compared to your foe [sic]. -Your opponent has a fiercer attack than you do.My stats: Strength: 98 (80) Intellect: 46 (43) Reflexes: 37 (31) HP: 57/153 PP: 75/90

Yingxiong

Drop Rate Spadings

Drop data from a total of 875 encounters:

  • datamites (stolen from here):
No drops One drop Two drops
Observed 74.2 ± 3% 24.8 ± 2.9% 1 ± 0.7%
Predicted 15%/10% 76.5% 22% 1.5%

Looks like a good fit to me ;) Patojonas 11:07, 7 October 2012 (PDT)



Drop data from a total of 1032 encounters:

No drops One drop Two drops
Observed 70.7 ± 2.8% 27.8 ± 2.8% 1.5 ± 0.7%
Predicted 20%/10% 72% 26% 2%

Looks like the previous data set wasn't good enough, 20/10 is a better fit now. Patojonas 10:18, 6 March 2015 (PST)