Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bonus melee damage"

From Twilight Heroes Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (New page: So what should go on this page? Bonus elemental/melee damage for sure, but do we want to split out bonus spell damage (e.g., pandimensional scepter) onto a separate page? What about pa...)
 
m (Talk:Bonus damage moved to Talk:Bonus melee damage: splitting into melee/spell/strike-back)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
So what should go on this page? Bonus elemental/melee damage for sure, but do we want to split out bonus spell damage (e.g., [[pandimensional scepter]]) onto a separate page? What about passive damage like [[Paradox Naught]]? --[[User:Bagatelle|Bagatelle]] 19:52, 9 April 2008 (MST)
 
So what should go on this page? Bonus elemental/melee damage for sure, but do we want to split out bonus spell damage (e.g., [[pandimensional scepter]]) onto a separate page? What about passive damage like [[Paradox Naught]]? --[[User:Bagatelle|Bagatelle]] 19:52, 9 April 2008 (MST)
 +
:I would say there should be three pages: "Bonus Melee Damage", "Bonus Spell Damage", and "Strike-back Damage" (which would be the Naught, Fireshield, etc.) [[User:Cristiona|Cristiona]]

Latest revision as of 17:27, 12 April 2008

So what should go on this page? Bonus elemental/melee damage for sure, but do we want to split out bonus spell damage (e.g., pandimensional scepter) onto a separate page? What about passive damage like Paradox Naught? --Bagatelle 19:52, 9 April 2008 (MST)

I would say there should be three pages: "Bonus Melee Damage", "Bonus Spell Damage", and "Strike-back Damage" (which would be the Naught, Fireshield, etc.) Cristiona