Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ring of Fellowship"
From Twilight Heroes Wiki
(just a thought) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
shouldn't we link [[indivisible]] with invisibility since they are the same thing, with slight differences?--[[User:Reaper|Reaper]] 22:10, 1 September 2008 (MST) | shouldn't we link [[indivisible]] with invisibility since they are the same thing, with slight differences?--[[User:Reaper|Reaper]] 22:10, 1 September 2008 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Well, technically they're different. The ring gives a passive, indefinite duration effect with no name, while the potion gives a timed effect with a name. Making a whole page to explain what chat invisibility means seems excessive and likely to cause superfluous clicks on the part of wiki users. Seems like it would just be easier to explain it twice. If we get a rush of items granting this effect, it might be worth it, though. [[User:Cristiona|Cristiona]] | ||
Latest revision as of 17:35, 2 September 2008
shouldn't we link indivisible with invisibility since they are the same thing, with slight differences?--Reaper 22:10, 1 September 2008 (MST)
Well, technically they're different. The ring gives a passive, indefinite duration effect with no name, while the potion gives a timed effect with a name. Making a whole page to explain what chat invisibility means seems excessive and likely to cause superfluous clicks on the part of wiki users. Seems like it would just be easier to explain it twice. If we get a rush of items granting this effect, it might be worth it, though. Cristiona
