Difference between revisions of "Talk:That Old Trope Again?"

From Twilight Heroes Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Response)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
* Assuming y'all are talking about the [[Rorrim mirror]] and not the [[Mirror of Nitocris]] as it has a Level 70 requirement, correct? --[[User:Corrupt Shadow|<font color="696969" size="3" face="Calibri">'''Corrupt'''</font><font color="A9A9A9" size="3" face="Calibri">'''Shadow'''</font>]] 07:41, 4 April 2011 (PDT)
 
* Assuming y'all are talking about the [[Rorrim mirror]] and not the [[Mirror of Nitocris]] as it has a Level 70 requirement, correct? --[[User:Corrupt Shadow|<font color="696969" size="3" face="Calibri">'''Corrupt'''</font><font color="A9A9A9" size="3" face="Calibri">'''Shadow'''</font>]] 07:41, 4 April 2011 (PDT)
 +
 +
Yeah CS, the [[Rorrim mirror]] is correct! :) --[[User:Strlikecrazy|Strlikecrazy]] 09:47, 4 April 2011 (PDT)

Revision as of 08:47, 4 April 2011

NardoLoopa has it.--Muhandes 07:45, 1 April 2011 (PDT)

Googling for 'one man cannot summon the future' brings up a Star Trek episode involving evil twins, which together with the picture(electron/positron=opposites) and this being an 'old tropes' makes me think this could have something to do with the your evil twin foe. Kurg

  • I agree with Kurg on this one. Has to be battling the your evil twin adventure X-number of times. --CorruptShadow 19:05, 3 April 2011 (PDT)

Can't help you. I don't even remember getting it --NardoLoopa 11:08, 1 April 2011 (PDT)

I missed the msg, but i can confirm it is evil twin related. I killed about 20 with the mirror equipped (dunno if the mirror makes a difference!) and i got the badge. --Strlikecrazy 05:50, 4 April 2011 (PDT)

I actually tried that with an alt several times too - defeat the twin with the mirror and normal equip, mirror and pajamas, and (possibly) even JUST the mirror. Didn't get it though - perhaps I should keep trying, though unfortunately I lost track of how many fights I already did. Kurg 06:37, 4 April 2011 (PDT)

Yeah CS, the Rorrim mirror is correct! :) --Strlikecrazy 09:47, 4 April 2011 (PDT)