Talk:Animal Kung-Foolery: Difference between revisions
Hoyifung04 (talk | contribs) Still unspaded? |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Someone should probably spade this. I think Cris confirmed that it is autohit, but everything else is wrong. --[[User:Hoyifung04|hoyifung04]] 07:27, 12 November 2012 (PST) | Someone should probably spade this. I think Cris confirmed that it is autohit, but everything else is wrong. --[[User:Hoyifung04|hoyifung04]] 07:27, 12 November 2012 (PST) | ||
From my uses I can tell it always hits like a spell, is based on the Strength stat alone and the power of the weapons has a contribution proportional to its power, however I dunno how skill points affect it. [[User:Patojonas|Patojonas]] 08:46, 12 November 2012 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 16:46, 12 November 2012
Some hit messages: You perform a flying duck elbow, and do 123 damage. You perform a squirrel nibble followed by a chipmunk crunch, and do 115 damage. You perform a tortoise twister, and do 118 damage. You perform a snarling frog wallop, and do 110 damage. You perform an aardvark scissor kick, and do 120 damage.
-- Some etremely limited "testing" (nothing reliable) suggest that this is autohit, damage may be something like base weapon damage + 10*SP, didn't seem to go up with level/strength (as much as normal attack did). --XKiv 10:41, 25 February 2012 (PST)
Someone should probably spade this. I think Cris confirmed that it is autohit, but everything else is wrong. --hoyifung04 07:27, 12 November 2012 (PST)
From my uses I can tell it always hits like a spell, is based on the Strength stat alone and the power of the weapons has a contribution proportional to its power, however I dunno how skill points affect it. Patojonas 08:46, 12 November 2012 (PST)