Talk:Bonus melee damage: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m New page: So what should go on this page? Bonus elemental/melee damage for sure, but do we want to split out bonus spell damage (e.g., pandimensional scepter) onto a separate page? What about pa... |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
So what should go on this page? Bonus elemental/melee damage for sure, but do we want to split out bonus spell damage (e.g., [[pandimensional scepter]]) onto a separate page? What about passive damage like [[Paradox Naught]]? --[[User:Bagatelle|Bagatelle]] 19:52, 9 April 2008 (MST) | So what should go on this page? Bonus elemental/melee damage for sure, but do we want to split out bonus spell damage (e.g., [[pandimensional scepter]]) onto a separate page? What about passive damage like [[Paradox Naught]]? --[[User:Bagatelle|Bagatelle]] 19:52, 9 April 2008 (MST) | ||
:I would say there should be three pages: "Bonus Melee Damage", "Bonus Spell Damage", and "Strike-back Damage" (which would be the Naught, Fireshield, etc.) [[User:Cristiona|Cristiona]] | |||
Revision as of 05:01, 10 April 2008
So what should go on this page? Bonus elemental/melee damage for sure, but do we want to split out bonus spell damage (e.g., pandimensional scepter) onto a separate page? What about passive damage like Paradox Naught? --Bagatelle 19:52, 9 April 2008 (MST)
- I would say there should be three pages: "Bonus Melee Damage", "Bonus Spell Damage", and "Strike-back Damage" (which would be the Naught, Fireshield, etc.) Cristiona