Difference between revisions of "Talk:TNT"
From Twilight Heroes Wiki
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Certainly looks that way. Maybe test against a non-scaling foe where we have a good idea of the HP? Also, you'd want to test without any strikeback and without an attacking sidekick. [[User:Cristiona|Cristiona]] | Certainly looks that way. Maybe test against a non-scaling foe where we have a good idea of the HP? Also, you'd want to test without any strikeback and without an attacking sidekick. [[User:Cristiona|Cristiona]] | ||
| − | oh come on! just look at those hits! it's obviously 66% of remaining health, maybe with some variability, but definitely around 2 thirds. | + | oh come on! just look at those hits! it's obviously 66% of remaining health, maybe with some variability, but definitely around 2 thirds.{{unsigned|The supernaturalist|04:10, 5 April 2009}} |
| + | |||
| + | : Sure does. Please sign in the future.--[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] 06:13, 5 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:13, 4 April 2009
Alright so Ryme said in the forum that some spaders should take a longer look at it. So I am going to start spading it and hopefully others will join in. Hits: 2997 against Grumpy Grey Giant, then 1019 against same one, then 354 against it again. Hypo: Maybe a percentage of remaining health? --Zillow--
Certainly looks that way. Maybe test against a non-scaling foe where we have a good idea of the HP? Also, you'd want to test without any strikeback and without an attacking sidekick. Cristiona
oh come on! just look at those hits! it's obviously 66% of remaining health, maybe with some variability, but definitely around 2 thirds.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by The supernaturalist (talk • contribs) 04:10, 5 April 2009.
- Sure does. Please sign in the future.--Muhandes 06:13, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
