Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Space Station"
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Maybe we should put the old information from the space station under the most current version (or even only link to it and institute a new page)? All the other areas look like the ones ingame, so shouldn't the Space Station follow suit? --[[User:Alarion|Alarion]] 15:03, 17 June 2009 (UTC) | Maybe we should put the old information from the space station under the most current version (or even only link to it and institute a new page)? All the other areas look like the ones ingame, so shouldn't the Space Station follow suit? --[[User:Alarion|Alarion]] 15:03, 17 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
: I'm not sure what you mean by "old version". All the versions in the page are current, I verified this last week when I redid the quest on a multi. Granted, steps 1-4 are only there for one day. Step 5 however is there from the moment you get there until you level to 12. I agree I'd prefer to have step 5 and the final step, rather than step 4 and the final step which is the current state, but I don't feel it is worth my time to make an imagemap for step 5. If you make one I think it should replace the current imagemap of step 4.--[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] 17:48, 17 June 2009 (UTC) | : I'm not sure what you mean by "old version". All the versions in the page are current, I verified this last week when I redid the quest on a multi. Granted, steps 1-4 are only there for one day. Step 5 however is there from the moment you get there until you level to 12. I agree I'd prefer to have step 5 and the final step, rather than step 4 and the final step which is the current state, but I don't feel it is worth my time to make an imagemap for step 5. If you make one I think it should replace the current imagemap of step 4.--[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] 17:48, 17 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::Well, I'd prefer it (aesthetically) to look like the final version of the space station, at least the top of the page. Because that is what most heroes will see when they visit the space station (since steps 1 through 5 should be temporal at best). But maybe that is just me, and I'm off with that. Anyone care to state their opinion? --[[User:Alarion|Alarion]] 18:34, 17 June 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 10:34, 17 June 2009
Where should we record things that used to exist, for historical reasons? Is there like an Archive:[page] or something? Cause I've got all the day one things gathered [though I didn't think to record the positioning, so I'd have to play some to make it look right (shouldn't be hard)] for historical reasons. --Valera
The image and locations shown don't appear right away for newer characters. When Susan Novak first tells you that the Space Station is available, and you go there, the space barrier is about halfway across the screen and only the Portal is accessible. It takes several days for the other locations on the station to appear. I haven't gotten any robots yet, maybe tonight... --Tarwix 13:12, 29 February 2008 (MST)
Maybe we should put the old information from the space station under the most current version (or even only link to it and institute a new page)? All the other areas look like the ones ingame, so shouldn't the Space Station follow suit? --Alarion 15:03, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you mean by "old version". All the versions in the page are current, I verified this last week when I redid the quest on a multi. Granted, steps 1-4 are only there for one day. Step 5 however is there from the moment you get there until you level to 12. I agree I'd prefer to have step 5 and the final step, rather than step 4 and the final step which is the current state, but I don't feel it is worth my time to make an imagemap for step 5. If you make one I think it should replace the current imagemap of step 4.--Muhandes 17:48, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I'd prefer it (aesthetically) to look like the final version of the space station, at least the top of the page. Because that is what most heroes will see when they visit the space station (since steps 1 through 5 should be temporal at best). But maybe that is just me, and I'm off with that. Anyone care to state their opinion? --Alarion 18:34, 17 June 2009 (UTC)