Talk:Squidopus ink: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
m (Acknowledging answer to query) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* Q: What, precisely, is the advantage of stunning an opponent for just one round? [[User:Richardhg|Richard H-G]] 17:38, 22 November 2011 (PST) | * Q: What, precisely, is the advantage of stunning an opponent for just one round? [[User:Richardhg|Richard H-G]] 17:38, 22 November 2011 (PST) | ||
*: If you have a combat familiar, that's a free attack. [[User:Cristiona|Cristiona]] | *: If you have a combat familiar, that's a free attack. [[User:Cristiona|Cristiona]] | ||
*:: Good point. Thanks. [[User:Richardhg|Richard H-G]] 00:38, 1 December 2011 (PST) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:38, 1 December 2011
looks like it has the same effect as stealth and the sneakiers.--Reaper 15:49, 6 September 2008 (MST)
Combat Use
- Q: What, precisely, is the advantage of stunning an opponent for just one round? Richard H-G 17:38, 22 November 2011 (PST)
- If you have a combat familiar, that's a free attack. Cristiona
- Good point. Thanks. Richard H-G 00:38, 1 December 2011 (PST)
- If you have a combat familiar, that's a free attack. Cristiona