Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ice cuberg"
From Twilight Heroes Wiki
m (preliminary data indicates a mechanic similar to ball o' fire) |
m (4 more uses) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Trying to discover damage formulas by testing against league bosses is pretty much always going to be a bad idea. [[User:Cristiona|Cristiona]] ([[User talk:Cristiona|talk]]) 19:02, 22 December 2013 (PST) | Trying to discover damage formulas by testing against league bosses is pretty much always going to be a bad idea. [[User:Cristiona|Cristiona]] ([[User talk:Cristiona|talk]]) 19:02, 22 December 2013 (PST) | ||
− | :If I hadn't used it against it I wouldn't know it is a % damage item ;). I also said it needed checking on tougher foes, which I just did, on a grumpy grey giant: 1st use, 624 damage and the sucker fumbled for 309 damage. Next turn it dealt 867 damage. A set % is impossible with these numbers, so I guess maybe a random % between 2 values, similar to the [[ball o' fire]]? It is also possible that the more you use in a row the stronger it gets, would need a day where an alt gets 3 or 4 of these to check if that is the case.<br>Using on a water spider which had 1038 hp left caused 155 damage.<br>Using on a crawler bot which had 482 hp left caused 77 damage. [[User:Patojonas|Patojonas]] 06:36, 23 December 2013 (PST) | + | :If I hadn't used it against it I wouldn't know it is a % damage item ;). I also said it needed checking on tougher foes, which I just did, on a grumpy grey giant: 1st use, 624 damage and the sucker fumbled for 309 damage. Next turn it dealt 867 damage. A set % is impossible with these numbers, so I guess maybe a random % between 2 values, similar to the [[ball o' fire]]?<strike>It is also possible that the more you use in a row the stronger it gets, would need a day where an alt gets 3 or 4 of these to check if that is the case.</strike><br>Using on a water spider which had 1038 hp left caused 155 damage.<br>Using on a crawler bot which had 482 hp left caused 77 damage. [[User:Patojonas|Patojonas]] 06:36, 23 December 2013 (PST) |
+ | :Using on a Rock'em Bot which had 1390 hp left caused 250 damage. | ||
+ | :Using on a crawler bot which had 1395 hp left caused 237 damage. | ||
+ | :Using on a Grumpy Grey Giant which had 1815 hp left caused 308 damage. | ||
+ | :Using on a Grumpy Grey Giant which had 1507 hp left caused 256 damage.(same grumpy) | ||
+ | |||
+ | So far values seem to range from 15% to 18% damage. Consecutive uses in the same fight don't make it stronger. Need moar data to determine range.[[User:Patojonas|Patojonas]] 13:38, 26 December 2013 (PST) |
Revision as of 13:38, 26 December 2013
Using this on the moletron resulted in 159 damage. Maybe it's % damage? Needs to be checked on tougher foes. Patojonas 10:53, 22 December 2013 (PST)
Trying to discover damage formulas by testing against league bosses is pretty much always going to be a bad idea. Cristiona (talk) 19:02, 22 December 2013 (PST)
- If I hadn't used it against it I wouldn't know it is a % damage item ;). I also said it needed checking on tougher foes, which I just did, on a grumpy grey giant: 1st use, 624 damage and the sucker fumbled for 309 damage. Next turn it dealt 867 damage. A set % is impossible with these numbers, so I guess maybe a random % between 2 values, similar to the ball o' fire?
It is also possible that the more you use in a row the stronger it gets, would need a day where an alt gets 3 or 4 of these to check if that is the case.
Using on a water spider which had 1038 hp left caused 155 damage.
Using on a crawler bot which had 482 hp left caused 77 damage. Patojonas 06:36, 23 December 2013 (PST) - Using on a Rock'em Bot which had 1390 hp left caused 250 damage.
- Using on a crawler bot which had 1395 hp left caused 237 damage.
- Using on a Grumpy Grey Giant which had 1815 hp left caused 308 damage.
- Using on a Grumpy Grey Giant which had 1507 hp left caused 256 damage.(same grumpy)
So far values seem to range from 15% to 18% damage. Consecutive uses in the same fight don't make it stronger. Need moar data to determine range.Patojonas 13:38, 26 December 2013 (PST)