Difference between revisions of "Talk:Extra attacks"
m (Closing the table) |
|||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| Gadgeteer || 9 || 91(70) || [[Umbra's Shadow Blaster]] || 0 || 5 || 10.4-18 || 24-31.5 | | Gadgeteer || 9 || 91(70) || [[Umbra's Shadow Blaster]] || 0 || 5 || 10.4-18 || 24-31.5 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Gadgeteer || 10 || 100(78) || [[Umbra's Shadow Blaster]] || 0 || 12-17.5 || 27-36.5 | + | | Gadgeteer || 10 || 100(78) || [[Umbra's Shadow Blaster]] || 0 || 5 || 12-17.5 || 27-36.5 |
|- | |- | ||
| Gadgeteer || 10 || 103(77) || [[Umbra's Shadow Blaster]] || +10 || 5 || 11-26 || 27.5-40.5 | | Gadgeteer || 10 || 103(77) || [[Umbra's Shadow Blaster]] || +10 || 5 || 11-26 || 27.5-40.5 | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
If you're trying to spade bonus ranged attacks, why are you corrupting your data by using only weapons that add additional attacks? For what it's worth, I believe the max number of natural attacks is 8. [[User:Cristiona|Cristiona]] | If you're trying to spade bonus ranged attacks, why are you corrupting your data by using only weapons that add additional attacks? For what it's worth, I believe the max number of natural attacks is 8. [[User:Cristiona|Cristiona]] | ||
| + | :So far I was spading simply while playing and I used weapons which I found best at the moment. But I still don't see why using +attack weapons corrupts the data. Natural as in just reflexes based? --[[User:Shikao|Shikao]] 04:22, 12 November 2010 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 04:22, 12 November 2010
More info
I was playing gadgeteer when suddenly hundred of questions regarding ranged attacks in round popped in my mind. Maybe some of them you could answer right away, others you will maybe say are not worthy being mentioned in wiki, nevertheless here they are:
- What is maximum attacks in round? Is there any? Does it depend?
- So far I saw 6 - Gadget/Umbra/lvl 11/Ref 126 (93)/ +10 ranged
- What affects their number?
- Some weapons - for sure. Reflex too, but how exactly?
- How much physical dmg deals one attack?
- With the same setup as above, my result was 18.8-29.6 and what I guess were crits (31.6 - Human campfire)38.4-50
--Shikao 10:38, 9 November 2010 (PST)
Gadget/Zeno's Bow/lvl 7/ Ref 71 (50)/ +10 ranged/max 3, 11-18, crit 28-33
Gadget/Zeno's Bow/lvl 7/ Ref 71 (50)//max 3, 8.6-15, crit 24
Until now average I gave were with +ranged calculated in, cause I assumed wrongly that +ranged is added to each attack. However, from data I collected it looks it's rather added at the end together with elemental damage. Therefore since now I will be deducing +ranged from damaged dealt and then divide by number of attacks to calculate average.
--Shikao 12:06, 9 November 2010 (PST)
| Class | Level | Reflex | Weapon | +ranged total (including weapon) |
max attacks in round | average attack | average crit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gadgeteer | 8 | 84(57) | The golem's Glock | +10 | 3 | 17-29.6 | 51 |
| Gadgeteer | 8 | 89(62) | The golem's Glock | +10 | 3 | 16-28.6 | |
| Gadgeteer | 9 | 91(70) | Umbra's Shadow Blaster | 0 | 5 | 10.4-18 | 24-31.5 |
| Gadgeteer | 10 | 100(78) | Umbra's Shadow Blaster | 0 | 5 | 12-17.5 | 27-36.5 |
| Gadgeteer | 10 | 103(77) | Umbra's Shadow Blaster | +10 | 5 | 11-26 | 27.5-40.5 |
| Gadgeteer | 11 | 118(86) | Umbra's Shadow Blaster | +20 | 5 | 12.2-26 | 25-41.5 |
| Gadgeteer | 11 | 138(93) | Umbra's Shadow Blaster | +10 | 6 | 15.4-27.8 | 38.4-62 |
| Gadgeteer | 12 | 147(104) | Umbra's Shadow Blaster | +10 | 6 | 15.8-21.8 | 30.4-46.4 |
If you're trying to spade bonus ranged attacks, why are you corrupting your data by using only weapons that add additional attacks? For what it's worth, I believe the max number of natural attacks is 8. Cristiona
- So far I was spading simply while playing and I used weapons which I found best at the moment. But I still don't see why using +attack weapons corrupts the data. Natural as in just reflexes based? --Shikao 04:22, 12 November 2010 (PST)
